Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 12, 2019. It is now read-only.

More configured, external links #288

Open
2 tasks
cmc333333 opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 8 comments
Open
2 tasks

More configured, external links #288

cmc333333 opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@cmc333333
Copy link
Contributor

Right now we only account for "ATF I 5300.1" and "ATF I 5300.2". What else?

  • Form 4587
  • ATF Publication 5300.5
  1. Find the docs in the reg
  2. Find the files they should point to
  3. Configure the parser to map those strings
@brittag
Copy link
Contributor

brittag commented Jan 27, 2016

Examples of the listed items:

Additional references to other kinds of items that aren't automatically linked:

@jehlers
Copy link

jehlers commented Feb 5, 2016

@brittag
Copy link
Contributor

brittag commented Feb 5, 2016

Some external link formatting that could be improved:

@cmc333333
Copy link
Contributor Author

@brittag what do you think those point to? Does the dash here mean "through"? I can make an argument for

26 CFR 301.7701-12

to mean

26 CFR 301.7701, 26 CFR 301.7702, ....26 CFR 301.7712

but the others are less clear to me.

@brittag
Copy link
Contributor

brittag commented Feb 6, 2016

It looks like "26 CFR 301.7701-12" is a specific section on page 740 of the linked document:

screen shot 2016-02-05 at 4 42 45 pm

"26 CFR 1.1563-1" is a particular section as seen here - along with "26 CFR 1.1563-2" (starting on the last page of that PDF). Interestingly, I can't find "26 CFR 1.1563-1" in the document auto-linked from eRegulations.

And "26 CFR 301.6091-1(b)" points to a specific piece on page 61 of the linked document:

screen shot 2016-02-05 at 5 55 54 pm

@cmc333333
Copy link
Contributor Author

Innnteresting. We've not encountered sections with dashes in this like this (though we recently expanded the definition of a "section" to include non-numerals like "54a"). Annoyingly, we already use dashes to separate our hierarchy.

@jehlers
Copy link

jehlers commented Feb 10, 2016

@brittag
Copy link
Contributor

brittag commented Feb 11, 2016

A reference to a standard that could be linked:

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants