You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I was interested in using d4utils on combination with modepth, but I am not sure if I should build for source, or use the binary in the release, which is a year old, while the master branch seems to be updated recently. If the binary in the release is usable, I suppose it could be good for a bioconda package, too.
This may be related to issue (suggestion) #11, which asks for automatic binaries deployment.
Thanks for your attention.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, you should build from source, as the existing binary lacks recent bug fixes. @38 is working on new functionality for an imminent release, so stay tuned. @38 - is it possible to have automatic, versioned, binary deployment
Yep, we are going to publish a newer version after the recent work completes. At this time, you probably can use the the published version - as the file specification doesn't change.
@arq5x It's possible for automatically build and upload the artifact with github action.
Hi,
I was interested in using d4utils on combination with modepth, but I am not sure if I should build for source, or use the binary in the release, which is a year old, while the master branch seems to be updated recently. If the binary in the release is usable, I suppose it could be good for a bioconda package, too.
This may be related to issue (suggestion) #11, which asks for automatic binaries deployment.
Thanks for your attention.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: