Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which d4utils version to use? #35

Open
javiercguard opened this issue Oct 5, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Which d4utils version to use? #35

javiercguard opened this issue Oct 5, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@javiercguard
Copy link

Hi,
I was interested in using d4utils on combination with modepth, but I am not sure if I should build for source, or use the binary in the release, which is a year old, while the master branch seems to be updated recently. If the binary in the release is usable, I suppose it could be good for a bioconda package, too.

This may be related to issue (suggestion) #11, which asks for automatic binaries deployment.

Thanks for your attention.

@arq5x
Copy link
Collaborator

arq5x commented Oct 6, 2021

Currently, you should build from source, as the existing binary lacks recent bug fixes. @38 is working on new functionality for an imminent release, so stay tuned. @38 - is it possible to have automatic, versioned, binary deployment

@javiercguard
Copy link
Author

Okay, thanks!

@38
Copy link
Owner

38 commented Oct 13, 2021

Yep, we are going to publish a newer version after the recent work completes. At this time, you probably can use the the published version - as the file specification doesn't change.

@arq5x It's possible for automatically build and upload the artifact with github action.

@38 38 closed this as completed Dec 10, 2021
@38 38 reopened this Dec 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants