generated from AOSSIE-Org/Template-Repo
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Expand file tree
/
Copy path.coderabbit.yaml
More file actions
280 lines (249 loc) · 11.4 KB
/
.coderabbit.yaml
File metadata and controls
280 lines (249 loc) · 11.4 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
# Enables IDE autocompletion for this config file
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
# Language for CodeRabbit's review comments
language: en
# Enable experimental features (currently not using any specific early_access features)
early_access: true
chat:
# CodeRabbit will automatically respond to @coderabbitai mentions in PR comments
auto_reply: true
issue_enrichment:
labeling:
auto_apply_labels: true
labeling_instructions:
- label: bug
instructions: Issues reporting bugs, errors, crashes, incorrect behavior, or unexpected results. This includes runtime errors, logic errors, broken functionality, regressions, and any deviation from expected or documented behavior.
- label: enhancement
instructions: Feature requests, improvements to existing functionality, performance optimizations, refactoring suggestions, UI/UX enhancements, and any suggestions to make the project better or add new capabilities.
- label: documentation
instructions: Documentation updates, additions, corrections, or clarifications needed. This includes missing docs, outdated information, unclear instructions, API documentation, code examples, README improvements, and any requests for better explanations or guides.
planning:
enabled: true
auto_planning:
enabled: true
labels:
- "plan-me" # Auto-plan issues with this label
- "feature" # Also auto-plan these
- "!no-plan" # Never auto-plan issues with this label
reviews:
profile: assertive # Options: chill (focuses on significant issues, less nitpicky about style), assertive (more thorough, flags style issues and minor improvements too)
auto_review:
# Automatically trigger reviews when PRs are opened or updated
enabled: true
# Skip auto-review if PR title contains these keywords
ignore_title_keywords:
- "WIP"
# Don't auto-review draft PRs
drafts: false
# Only auto-review PRs targeting these branches
base_branches:
- main
- develop
# Include a high-level summary at the start of each review
high_level_summary: true
# Generate sequence diagrams for complex code flows
sequence_diagrams: true
# Include poems in reviews
poem: true
# Show review completion status
review_status: true
# Keep the walkthrough section expanded by default
collapse_walkthrough: false
# Include summary of all changed files
changed_files_summary: true
# Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments)
request_changes_workflow: true
# Pre-merge checks to enforce before merging PRs
pre_merge_checks:
description:
# Validate that PR has a proper description
mode: warning # Options: off, warning, error
docstrings:
# Disable docstring coverage checks (let's assume we don't need them)
mode: off
# Exclude these paths from reviews (build artifacts and dependencies)
path_filters:
- "!**/node_modules/**" # npm dependencies
- "!**/android/**" # Native Android build files
- "!**/ios/**" # Native iOS build files
- "!**/.expo/**" # Expo build cache
- "!**/.expo-shared/**" # Expo shared config
- "!**/dist/**" # Build output
# Use the following tools when reviewing
tools:
shellcheck:
enabled: true
ruff:
enabled: true
markdownlint:
enabled: true
github-checks:
enabled: true
timeout_ms: 90000
languagetool:
enabled: true
enabled_only: false
level: default
biome:
enabled: true
hadolint:
enabled: true
swiftlint:
enabled: true
phpstan:
enabled: true
level: default
golangci-lint:
enabled: true
yamllint:
enabled: true
gitleaks:
enabled: true
checkov:
enabled: true
detekt:
enabled: true
eslint:
enabled: true
# Apply the following labels to PRs
labeling_instructions:
- label: Python Lang
instructions: Apply when the PR/MR contains changes to python source-code
- label: Solidity Lang
instructions: Apply when the PR/MR contains changes to solidity source-code
- label: Typescript Lang
instructions: Apply when the PR/MR contains changes to javascript or typescript source-code
- label: Ergoscript Lang
instructions: Apply when the PR/MR contains changes to ergoscript source-code
- label: Bash Lang
instructions: >-
Apply when the PR/MR contains changes to shell-scripts or BASH code
snippets
- label: Make Lang
instructions: >-
Apply when the PR/MR contains changes to the file `Makefile` or makefile
code snippets
- label: Documentation
instructions: >-
Apply whenever project documentation (namely markdown source-code) is
updated by the PR/MR
- label: Linter
instructions: >-
Apply when the purpose of the PR/MR is related to fixing the feedback
from a linter
# Review instructions that apply to all files
instructions: >-
- Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
- Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
- Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
- Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
- Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed
- Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
- Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
- Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
- Look for code duplication
- Suggest code completions when:
- seeing a TODO comment
- seeing a FIXME comment
# Custom review instructions for specific file patterns
path_instructions:
# TypeScript/JavaScript files
- path: "**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
instructions: |
NextJS:
- Ensure that "use client" is being used
- Ensure that only features that allow pure client-side rendering are used
- NextJS best practices (including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods) are used.
TypeScript:
- Avoid 'any', use explicit types
- Prefer 'import type' for type imports
- Review for significant deviations from Google JavaScript style guide. Minor style issues are not a priority
- The code adheres to best practices associated with React
- The code adheres to best practices associated with React PWA
- The code adheres to best practices associated with SPA
- The code adheres to best practices recommended by lighthouse or similar tools for performance
- The code adheres to best practices associated with Node.js
- The code adheres to best practices recommended for performance
Security:
- No exposed API keys or sensitive data
- Use expo-secure-store for sensitive storage
- Validate deep linking configurations
- Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
Internationalization:
- User-visible strings should be externalized to resource files (i18n)
# HTML files
- path: "**/*.html"
instructions: |
Review the HTML code against the google html style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure that:
- The code adheres to best practices recommended by lighthouse or similar tools for performance
# CSS files
- path: "**/*.css"
instructions: |
Review the CSS code against the google css style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure that:
- The code adheres to best practices associated with CSS.
- The code adheres to best practices recommended by lighthouse or similar tools for performance.
- The code adheres to similar naming conventions for classes, ids.
# Python files
- path: "**/*.{py}"
instructions: |
Python:
- Check for major PEP 8 violations and Python best practices.
# Solidity Smart Contract files
- path: "**/*.sol"
instructions: |
Solidity:
- Review the Solidity contracts for security vulnerabilities and adherence to best practices.
- Ensure immutability is used appropriately (e.g., `immutable` and `constant` where applicable).
- Ensure there are no unbounded loops that could lead to gas exhaustion.
- Verify correct and explicit visibility modifiers for all state variables and functions.
- Flag variables that are declared but used only once or are unnecessary.
- Identify potential gas optimization opportunities without compromising readability or security.
- Verify that any modification to contract logic includes corresponding updates to automated tests.
- Ensure failure paths and revert scenarios are explicitly handled and validated.
- Validate proper access control enforcement (e.g., Ownable, RBAC, role checks).
- Ensure consistent and correct event emission for all state-changing operations.
- Confirm architectural consistency with existing contracts (no unintended storage layout changes unless clearly documented).
- Flag major feature additions or architectural changes that were implemented without prior design discussion (if applicable).
- Flag pull requests that mix unrelated changes or multiple concerns in a single submission.
- Ensure security-sensitive logic changes are not introduced without adequate test coverage.
- Review for common smart contract vulnerabilities, including but not limited to:
- Reentrancy
- Improper input validation
- Access control bypass
- Integer overflows/underflows (if using unchecked blocks)
- Front-running risks where applicable
# Javascript/Typescript test files
- path: "**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
instructions: |
Review test files for:
- Comprehensive coverage of component behavior
- Proper use of @testing-library/react-native
- Async behavior is properly tested
- Accessibility testing is included
- Test descriptions are sufficiently detailed to clarify the purpose of each test
- The tests are not tautological
# Solidity test files
- path: "**/*.test.{sol}"
instructions: |
Review test files for:
- Comprehensive coverage of contract behavior.
- Coverage of success paths, edge cases, and failure/revert scenarios.
- Proper validation of access control restrictions.
- Verification of event emissions where applicable.
- Explicit validation of state changes after each relevant function call.
- Adequate test updates whenever contract logic is modified.
- Deterministic behavior (tests should not rely on implicit execution order or shared mutable state).
- Clear and descriptive test names that reflect the intended behavior being validated.
# Asset files (images, fonts, etc.)
- path: "assets/**/*"
instructions: |
Review asset files for:
- Image optimization (appropriate size and format)
- Proper @2x and @3x variants for different screen densities
- SVG assets are optimized
- Font files are licensed and optimized