|
| 1 | +# Node.js Release WorkGroup Meeting 2022-04-07 |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Links |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +* **Recording**: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_1tB3YRG2A |
| 6 | +* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/735 |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Present |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +* Beth Griggs (@BethGriggs) |
| 11 | +* Bryan English (@bengl) |
| 12 | +* Danielle Adams (@danielleadams) |
| 13 | +* Juan Arboleda (@soyjuanarbol) |
| 14 | +* Richard Lau (@richardlau) |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Agenda |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +## Announcements |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +* Node.js 18 is due to be released on the 19th April. |
| 21 | + * Latest release candidate is available - https://nodejs.org/download/rc/v18.0.0-rc.3/. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +### nodejs/Release |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +* Process for unintentional breaking changes [#728](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/728) |
| 26 | + * The specific issue/PR that raised this has been addressed. |
| 27 | + * Some process documentation would be helpful. |
| 28 | + * Let’s untag from the agenda and add a comment stating our intent to create some guidance. |
| 29 | +* Create a guide on ‘What to do when a release is broken? [#558](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/558) |
| 30 | + * Should form part of the same release guide. |
| 31 | +* Working out a policy around reverts for LTS branches [#535](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/535) |
| 32 | + * Should form part of the same release guide. |
| 33 | +* Proposal to rename CITGM team to `release-automation` [#557](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/557) |
| 34 | + * Plan was to grant releasers access to the automation repositories. |
| 35 | + * (Action) To confirm whether the access has been added. |
| 36 | + * Bryan worked on a fix for `branch-diff` - it would be good for us to have access to be able to merge it. |
| 37 | +* Release plan - v18.x Current [#737](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/737) |
| 38 | + * Node.js 18 release plan issue has been following our typical schedule for current re |
0 commit comments