Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dead links on hear guidance document #7

Open
ds10 opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Dead links on hear guidance document #7

ds10 opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@ds10
Copy link
Member

ds10 commented Nov 4, 2016

From @asimong on xcri repo

Currently links from the HEAR 1.0c Specification to the "HEAR Guidance Document" give 404, as they point to withdrawn page on server belonging to APS.
Please find an active copy and link to that.

@alanepaull
Copy link
Contributor

Suggest use: http://www.hear.ac.uk/sites/default/files/HEAR%20Reference%20Pack%20Feb%202014_0.pdf
This one is the most up-to-date (I think) version of the guidance document. It's been renamed the Reference Pack.
Alternatively, consider using the more general: http://www.hear.ac.uk/guidance.
This one leads to all the currently "official" HEAR materials.
Alan

@asimong
Copy link
Contributor

asimong commented Jan 12, 2017 via email

@alanepaull
Copy link
Contributor

As far as I am aware, it's the HEA that is formally responsible for the HEAR. I don't think we're in a position to update the Reference Pack - that's much more about non-technical implementation issues, management and organisation, than the HEAR XML data standard. The latter has always been seen as peripheral by the wider HEAR community. I have no knowledge of who in HEA is responsible - I did try to find out a while back, but rapidly hit a dead end.

What's the precise nature of the Cetis remit? I doubt that it covers all the HEAR documentation, because I'm sure that Jisc doesn't have a remit for that.

I've taken the liberty of changing the 1.1 spec draft to point to the HEAR website PDF, rather than my own website, because the alanpaull.co.uk bit is definitely wrong.

Alan

@asimong
Copy link
Contributor

asimong commented Jan 12, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants