A vote for /paul:status

[neuraldevelopment]

Hi Chris,

thanks a lot for your wonderful work on Paul and the others tools. I've been using Paul now for a while and combining it with the linear issue tool, really a nice combination.

One thing however is really bothering me, it's the /paul:process command. I don't know if there is a plan behind the naming convention but here I would like to vote for the revival of the /paul:status command 😊

Thanks a lot and keep pushing.

Best regards,
Ralph

[ChristopherKahler]

@neuraldevelopment hey Ralph, there's no /paul:process command — you might be thinking of /paul:progress. /paul:status still exists and works, it just redirects to /paul:progress which does everything status did plus routes you to the next action. so if you prefer typing :status it'll still get you there.