You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: Readme.md
+9-2Lines changed: 9 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Modflow-setup
4
4
Modflow-setup is a Python package for automating the setup of MODFLOW groundwater models from grid-independent source data including shapefiles, rasters, and other MODFLOW models that are geo-located. Input data and model construction options are summarized in a single configuration file. Source data are read from their native formats and mapped to a regular finite difference grid specified in the configuration file. An external array-based [Flopy](https://github.com/modflowpy/flopy) model instance with the desired packages is created from the sampled source data and configuration settings. MODFLOW input can then be written from the flopy model instance.
Fienen, M.N., Haserodt, M.J., Leaf, A.T., and Westenbroek, S.M., 2022, Simulation of regional groundwater flow and groundwater/lake interactions in the Central Sands, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2022–5046, 111 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225046.
62
+
63
+
Leaf, A.T., Duncan, L.L., Haugh, C.J., Hunt, R.J., and Rigby, J.R., 2023, Simulating groundwater flow in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain with a focus on the Mississippi Delta: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2023–5100, 143 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235100.
59
64
65
+
Workflow examples
66
+
-----------------------------------------------
60
67
Fienen, M.N, and Corson-Dosch, N.T., 2021, Groundwater Model Archive and Workflow for Neversink/Rondout Basin, New York, Source Water Delineation: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9HWSOHP.
Leaf, A.T., Duncan, L.L., and Haugh, C.J., 2023, MODFLOW 6 models for simulating groundwater flow in the Mississippi Embayment with a focus on the Mississippi Delta: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P971LPOB.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/source/references.rst
+16Lines changed: 16 additions & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -22,8 +22,24 @@ Hunt, R.J. and Zheng, C. (2012), The Current State of Modeling. Groundwater, 50:
22
22
23
23
Langevin, C.D., Hughes, J.D., Banta, E.R., Niswonger, R.G., Panday, Sorab, and Provost, A.M., 2017, Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Flow Model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A55, 197 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A55.
24
24
25
+
Leaf AT and Fienen MN (2022) Modflow-setup: Robust automation of groundwater model construction. Front. Earth Sci. 10:903965. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.903965
26
+
25
27
Niswonger, R.G., Panday, S., and Ibaraki, M., 2011, MODFLOW–NWT—A Newton formulation for MODFLOW–2005: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A37, 44 p. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A45
26
28
27
29
Westenbroek, S.M., Engott, J.A., Kelson, V.A., and Hunt, R.J., 2018, SWB Version 2.0—A soil-water-balance code for estimating net infiltration and other water-budget components: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A59, 118 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A59.
28
30
29
31
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), 2021. Central Sands Lake Study Report: Findings and Recommendations. Report to the Wisconsin State Legislature. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708791
Fienen, M.N., Haserodt, M.J., Leaf, A.T., and Westenbroek, S.M., 2022, Simulation of regional groundwater flow and groundwater/lake interactions in the Central Sands, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2022–5046, 111 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225046.
38
+
39
+
Leaf, A.T., Duncan, L.L., Haugh, C.J., Hunt, R.J., and Rigby, J.R., 2023, Simulating groundwater flow in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain with a focus on the Mississippi Delta: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2023–5100, 143 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235100.
40
+
41
+
Workflow examples
42
+
################################
43
+
Fienen, M.N, and Corson-Dosch, N.T., 2021, Groundwater Model Archive and Workflow for Neversink/Rondout Basin, New York, Source Water Delineation: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9HWSOHP.
44
+
45
+
Leaf, A.T., Duncan, L.L., and Haugh, C.J., 2023, MODFLOW 6 models for simulating groundwater flow in the Mississippi Embayment with a focus on the Mississippi Delta: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P971LPOB.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/source/release-history.rst
+18-1Lines changed: 18 additions & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -2,6 +2,24 @@
2
2
Release History
3
3
===============
4
4
5
+
Version 0.4.0 (2024-01-15)
6
+
----------------------------------------
7
+
* Improvements to lake package
8
+
9
+
* Add automatic writing of lake polygon and lake cell connection shapefiles
10
+
* Add name_column arg to shapefile input (which adds names to lake auxiliary tables)
11
+
* Allow PRISM input to be specified for all lakes (via single filename instead of dictionary)
12
+
* Allow specification of lakes_shapefile: without include_ids: item
13
+
* Move output tables to tables/ folder
14
+
* Pre-defined stress periods
15
+
16
+
* Allow stress period data to be pre-defined in a CSV file, which allows for more complicated or irregular stress period configurations that would otherwise require many group blocks; for example 7-day periods that always start on the same day of the year, which results in an extra period of 1 or 2 days at the end of each year.
17
+
* Bug fixes
18
+
19
+
* fix issue with identifier column dtypes, so that NHDPlus Hi-Res COMIDs (which require 64-bits as integers) work more robustly on Windows.
20
+
* in case of pre-defined (csvfile) stress periods, base perlen on end_datetime - start_datetime (what you see is what you get, and so that gaps between stress periods don't affect perlen); add trap for missing required columns
21
+
* see commit history for other misc. fixes
22
+
5
23
Version 0.3.1 (2023-08-17)
6
24
----------------------------------------
7
25
* change 'boundname_col' argument in basic stress CSV input to 'boundname_column' for consistency with other inputs.
@@ -11,7 +29,6 @@ Version 0.3.1 (2023-08-17)
11
29
* fixes to `grid.rasterize()` to better handle 64-bit integer and `object` dtypes
12
30
* update example configuration files to use new length unit arguments in `sfrmaker>=0.11.1`
0 commit comments