Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEATURE] Investigate Using a Lock Free Queue #16

Open
DeveloperPaul123 opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[FEATURE] Investigate Using a Lock Free Queue #16

DeveloperPaul123 opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@DeveloperPaul123
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed investigate

Comments

@DeveloperPaul123
Copy link
Owner

I'm curious to see if a lock-free queue significantly improves performance for the thread pool. We should do some tests with industry standard lock free queues in combination with std::move_only_function to see the difference in performance.

Queues/deques to test:
@DeveloperPaul123 DeveloperPaul123 self-assigned this Oct 14, 2022
@DeveloperPaul123 DeveloperPaul123 added enhancement New feature or request investigate labels Oct 14, 2022
@DeveloperPaul123
Copy link
Owner Author

https://github.com/erez-strauss/lockfree_mpmc_queue

@DeveloperPaul123
Copy link
Owner Author

Got an implementation in #54 but having trouble addressing some pesky bugs as I can't pin down the reason for them. Could use some assistance.

@DeveloperPaul123 DeveloperPaul123 added help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers and removed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Aug 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@DeveloperPaul123 DeveloperPaul123

Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed investigate
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@DeveloperPaul123