We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix wording
Add a note about the simple bfb tag
Fix link
Add some development guidance Based on suggestions from Stefanie Falk and Sunniva Indrehus
Add issue label: "tag: large"
Add notes on 'enh: new science' label
Rename 'enh - major new science' to 'enh - new science' This was requested by Will Wieder and Dave Lawrence: They wanted this label to encompass a greater range of issues so they could easily find the issues that involve new scientific capabilities, whether major or more minor.
Rename 'invalid' to 'non-issue' This sounds nicer, especially to people from the outside community who report issues.
Document the new 'type: -external' label
Include PRs in searches for next and high priority items
Fix a few more lowercase ctsm references for consistency
Change ESCOMP/ctsm to ESCOMP/CTSM Now that we have renamed the repo to ESCOMP/CTSM Most or all of these changes shouldn't be necessary, but it keeps things more self-consistent.
Updated Issue Labels and Issue Management (markdown)
more symmetry
Change search: Only add issues, not PRs, to high priority board
Give a link for searching for high priority issues not on the board This will make the weekly review process easier: can just click this link rather than following instructions.
Make table of contents label smaller
Add table of contents Generated with gh-md-toc Issue-Labels-and-Issue-Management.md then edited slightly.
Make text bold
Add a few more notes
Add notes on our weekly issue review/triage process
Reorder Issue-Labels-and-Issue-Management The issue management piece seems more important, so I'm putting it first
Rename Issue-Labels to Issue-Labels-and-Issue-Management