You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Maybe I'm missing something - but is it possible tu use MeanShift-Clustering with a given (fixed) bandwidth?
As far as I follow the implementation, even if I provide the KDE with a set bandwidth to the MeanShift-Constructor, it gets overwritten in MeanShift's cluster-method by calling mkde.setUsingData(dataSet, parallel);:
@Override
public int[] cluster(DataSet dataSet, boolean parallel, int[] designations)
{
// ...
final KernelFunction k = mkde.getKernelFunction();
mkde.setUsingData(dataSet, parallel);
mkde.scaleBandwidth(scaleBandwidthFactor);
// ...
}
Scaling the bandwidth seems not sufficient for me, as the scaled bandwidth isn't fixed. But as this is done inside the cluster-step, there seems to be no way to intercept or re-set the bandwidth...
Actually, it's obvious, that the Kernel-Density-Estimation wants to estimate the bandwidth, but in my case, I need a consistent bandwidth for multiple runs and need 'only' the clustering-step for the data.
Any help appreciated - thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe I'm missing something - but is it possible tu use MeanShift-Clustering with a given (fixed) bandwidth?
As far as I follow the implementation, even if I provide the KDE with a set bandwidth to the MeanShift-Constructor, it gets overwritten in MeanShift's cluster-method by calling
mkde.setUsingData(dataSet, parallel);
:Scaling the bandwidth seems not sufficient for me, as the scaled bandwidth isn't fixed. But as this is done inside the cluster-step, there seems to be no way to intercept or re-set the bandwidth...
A simple example how I've tried to use MeanShift:
Actually, it's obvious, that the Kernel-Density-Estimation wants to estimate the bandwidth, but in my case, I need a consistent bandwidth for multiple runs and need 'only' the clustering-step for the data.
Any help appreciated - thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: