Task: Benchmark CUBE behavior in local vs distributed execution modes
Status
New
Priority
P1
Context / Background
Architecture discussion around remote polling, logs, events, and messaging should be constrained by actual deployment behavior rather than assumption.
Meeting discussion highlighted that:
- local SSD-backed behavior is currently fast
- edge deployments may be much smaller than center deployments
- infrastructure-heavy solutions may not be justified across the whole deployment surface
Detailed Scope
- Run representative comparisons of
CUBE behavior in local vs distributed modes.
- Record observed differences relevant to:
- throughput
- latency
- storage overhead
- network overhead
- operational complexity
- Summarize implications for remote polling / telemetry / logging architecture.
Acceptance Criteria
- Benchmark scenario(s) are described.
- Results are recorded in this issue.
- Local vs distributed observations are explicit.
- Architectural implications are stated briefly and concretely.
Management Note
This issue is for evidence generation.
Out of scope:
- broad architecture debate without benchmark evidence
- implementation of a new telemetry stack
Task: Benchmark CUBE behavior in local vs distributed execution modes
Status
New
Priority
P1
Context / Background
Architecture discussion around remote polling, logs, events, and messaging should be constrained by actual deployment behavior rather than assumption.
Meeting discussion highlighted that:
Detailed Scope
CUBEbehavior in local vs distributed modes.Acceptance Criteria
Management Note
This issue is for evidence generation.
Out of scope: