Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to have simplified, traditional, or both of the classifiers, and other fields. #15

Open
gdelmee opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@gdelmee
Copy link

gdelmee commented Nov 2, 2023

As of now, autofill will fulfil the classifier field with both traditional and simplified classifiers, even we have the option to only fetch traditional, simplified, of both hanzi.

image

In order to match and have consistency in behavior, it could be great to have an option to choose between those three options (global or only for the classifiers, as the split is already in place for hanzi, but could also be useful then for ruby, examples, etc.), or new fields to separate those.

Fields to separate can still be useful for people learning both traditional and simplified as you might want to put classifier in front of the ruby notation in the answer:

image

@Gustaf-C Gustaf-C added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 2, 2023
@Gustaf-C
Copy link
Owner

Gustaf-C commented Nov 3, 2023

Yes this is something that has been bothering me for a while as well, thank you for registering it.
Unfortunately it is quite far down on the list of priorities atm.

@Gustaf-C Gustaf-C added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Nov 15, 2023
@Gustaf-C
Copy link
Owner

Is this what you had in mind?

image

@gdelmee
Copy link
Author

gdelmee commented Nov 20, 2023

Indeed, adding new fields could be a way to keep the compatibility with previous versions/existing cards.

Persons being interested in simplified or traditional could then add the relevant field.
Also, wanting to move forward later on adding the other one and/or the combined one with bulk filling should be good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants