Skip to content

Commit d4e2fca

Browse files
committed
fixes for CI
1 parent 69a6c0d commit d4e2fca

2 files changed

Lines changed: 17 additions & 17 deletions

File tree

FLT/FLT_files.lean

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ import FLT.AutomorphicRepresentation.Example
33
import FLT.Basic.Reductions
44
import FLT.EllipticCurve.Torsion
55
import FLT.ForMathlib.ActionTopology
6-
import FLT.ForMathlib.FGModuleTopology
76
import FLT.ForMathlib.MiscLemmas
87
import FLT.GaloisRepresentation.Cyclotomic
98
import FLT.GaloisRepresentation.HardlyRamified
@@ -12,6 +11,7 @@ import FLT.GlobalLanglandsConjectures.GLzero
1211
import FLT.GroupScheme.FiniteFlat
1312
import FLT.HIMExperiments.ContinuousSMul_topology
1413
import FLT.HIMExperiments.dual_topology
14+
import FLT.HIMExperiments.FGModuleTopology
1515
import FLT.HIMExperiments.flatness
1616
import FLT.HIMExperiments.module_topology
1717
import FLT.HIMExperiments.right_module_topology

FLT/HIMExperiments/FGModuleTopology.lean

Lines changed: 16 additions & 16 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ class IsModuleTopology [τA : TopologicalSpace A] : Prop where
5050

5151
-- because default binders for isModuleTopology' are wrong and currently
5252
-- there is no way to change this. There's a Lean 4 issue for this IIRC **TODO** where?
53-
lemma isModuleTopology [τA : TopologicalSpace A] [IsModuleTopology R A] :
53+
theorem isModuleTopology [τA : TopologicalSpace A] [IsModuleTopology R A] :
5454
τA = moduleTopology R A :=
5555
IsModuleTopology.isModuleTopology' (R := R) (A := A)
5656

@@ -88,14 +88,14 @@ variable {B : Type*} [AddCommMonoid B] [Module R B] [aB : TopologicalSpace B] [I
8888

8989
/-- Every `A`-linear map between two `A`-modules with the canonical topology is continuous. -/
9090
@[continuity, fun_prop]
91-
lemma continuous_of_linearMap (f : A →ₗ[R] B) : Continuous f := by
91+
theorem continuous_of_linearMap (f : A →ₗ[R] B) : Continuous f := by
9292
rw [isModuleTopology R A, isModuleTopology R B, continuous_iff_le_induced]
9393
apply iSup_le <| fun n ↦ iSup_le <| fun φ ↦ ?_
9494
rw [← coinduced_le_iff_le_induced, coinduced_compose]
9595
exact le_iSup_of_le n <| le_iSup_of_le (f.comp φ) le_rfl
9696

9797
-- should this be in the API?
98-
lemma continuous_of_linearMap' {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A]
98+
theorem continuous_of_linearMap' {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A]
9999
{B : Type*} [AddCommMonoid B] [Module R B] (f : A →ₗ[R] B) :
100100
@Continuous _ _ (moduleTopology R A) (moduleTopology R B) f := by
101101
letI : TopologicalSpace A := moduleTopology R A
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ end linear_map
133133

134134
section continuous_neg
135135

136-
lemma continuous_neg
136+
theorem continuous_neg
137137
(R : Type*) [TopologicalSpace R] [Ring R]
138138
(A : Type*) [AddCommGroup A] [Module R A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsModuleTopology R A] :
139139
Continuous (-· : A → A) :=
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ section surj
146146
variable {R : Type*} [τR : TopologicalSpace R] [Semiring R] [TopologicalSemiring R]
147147
variable {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [aA : TopologicalSpace A] [IsModuleTopology R A]
148148

149-
lemma coinduced_of_surjectivePiFin {n : ℕ} {φ : ((Fin n) → R) →ₗ[R] A} (hφ : Function.Surjective φ) :
149+
theorem coinduced_of_surjectivePiFin {n : ℕ} {φ : ((Fin n) → R) →ₗ[R] A} (hφ : Function.Surjective φ) :
150150
TopologicalSpace.coinduced φ Pi.topologicalSpace = moduleTopology R A := by
151151
apply le_antisymm
152152
· rw [← continuous_iff_coinduced_le, ← isModuleTopology R A]
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ lemma coinduced_of_surjectivePiFin {n : ℕ} {φ : ((Fin n) → R) →ₗ[R] A}
161161
exact continuous_of_linearMap α
162162

163163
/-- Any surjection between finite R-modules is coinducing for the R-module topology. -/
164-
lemma coinduced_of_surjective {B : Type*} [AddCommMonoid B] [aB : TopologicalSpace B] [Module R B]
164+
theorem coinduced_of_surjective {B : Type*} [AddCommMonoid B] [aB : TopologicalSpace B] [Module R B]
165165
[IsModuleTopology R B] [Module.Finite R A] {φ : A →ₗ[R] B} (hφ : Function.Surjective φ) :
166166
TopologicalSpace.coinduced φ (moduleTopology R A) = moduleTopology R B := by
167167
obtain ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := Module.Finite.exists_fin' R A
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ lemma coinduced_of_surjective {B : Type*} [AddCommMonoid B] [aB : TopologicalSpa
173173

174174
-- do I need this? Yes, I need (fin n) × fin m -> R
175175
-- **^TODO** why didn't have/let linter warn me
176-
lemma coinduced_of_surjectivePiFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {φ : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] A}
176+
theorem coinduced_of_surjectivePiFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {φ : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] A}
177177
(hφ : Function.Surjective φ) :
178178
TopologicalSpace.coinduced φ Pi.topologicalSpace = moduleTopology R A := by
179179
rw [(instPiFinite R ι).isModuleTopology']
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ variable {A : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [Module R A] [aA : TopologicalSpace A] [Is
188188

189189
variable (R A) in
190190
@[continuity, fun_prop]
191-
lemma continuous_add [Module.Finite R A] : Continuous (fun ab ↦ ab.1 + ab.2 : A × A → A) := by
191+
theorem continuous_add [Module.Finite R A] : Continuous (fun ab ↦ ab.1 + ab.2 : A × A → A) := by
192192
rw [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, isModuleTopology R A]
193193
obtain ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := Module.Finite.exists_fin' R A
194194
rw [← coinduced_of_surjectivePiFin hf]
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ lemma continuous_add [Module.Finite R A] : Continuous (fun ab ↦ ab.1 + ab.2 :
213213

214214
variable (R A) in
215215
@[continuity, fun_prop]
216-
lemma continuous_sum_finset (ι : Type*) [DecidableEq ι] (s : Finset ι) [Module.Finite R A] :
216+
theorem continuous_sum_finset (ι : Type*) [DecidableEq ι] (s : Finset ι) [Module.Finite R A] :
217217
Continuous (fun as ↦ ∑ i ∈ s, as i : (∀ (_ : ι), A) → A) := by
218218
induction s using Finset.induction
219219
· simp only [Finset.sum_empty]
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ lemma continuous_sum_finset (ι : Type*) [DecidableEq ι] (s : Finset ι) [Modul
227227
attribute [local instance] Fintype.ofFinite
228228
variable (R A) in
229229
@[continuity, fun_prop]
230-
lemma continuous_sum_finite (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] [Module.Finite R A] :
230+
theorem continuous_sum_finite (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] [Module.Finite R A] :
231231
Continuous (fun as ↦ ∑ i, as i : (∀ (_ : ι), A) → A) := by
232232
classical
233233
exact continuous_sum_finset R A ι _
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ noncomputable def isom'' (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (m n : Type*) [Finite m] [Deci
316316

317317
variable (m n : Type*) [Finite m] [DecidableEq m] (a1 : m → R)
318318
(b1 : n → R) (f : (m → R) →ₗ[R] A) (g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] B) in
319-
lemma key : ((TensorProduct.map f g ∘ₗ
319+
theorem key : ((TensorProduct.map f g ∘ₗ
320320
(isom'' R m n).symm.toLinearMap) fun mn ↦ a1 mn.1 * b1 mn.2) = f a1 ⊗ₜ[R] g b1 := by
321321
sorry
322322

@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ lemma key : ((TensorProduct.map f g ∘ₗ
336336
-- I don't know whether finiteness is needed on `B` here. Removing it here would enable
337337
-- removal in `continuous_bilinear`.
338338
@[continuity, fun_prop]
339-
lemma Module.continuous_tprod [Module.Finite R A] [Module.Finite R B] :
339+
theorem Module.continuous_tprod [Module.Finite R A] [Module.Finite R B] :
340340
Continuous (fun (ab : A × B) ↦ ab.1 ⊗ₜ ab.2 : A × B → A ⊗[R] B) := by
341341
-- reduce to R^m x R^n -> R^m ⊗ R^n
342342
-- then check explicitly
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ lemma Module.continuous_tprod [Module.Finite R A] [Module.Finite R B] :
377377
rfl
378378

379379
-- did I really use finiteness of B?
380-
lemma Module.continuous_bilinear [Module.Finite R A] [Module.Finite R B]
380+
theorem Module.continuous_bilinear [Module.Finite R A] [Module.Finite R B]
381381
{C : Type*} [AddCommGroup C] [Module R C] [TopologicalSpace C] [IsModuleTopology R C]
382382
(bil : A →ₗ[R] B →ₗ[R] C) : Continuous (fun ab ↦ bil ab.1 ab.2 : (A × B → C)) := by
383383
letI : TopologicalSpace (A ⊗[R] B) := moduleTopology R _
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ variable (D : Type*) [Ring D] [Algebra R D] [Module.Finite R D]
390390
variable [TopologicalSpace D] [IsModuleTopology R D]
391391

392392
@[continuity, fun_prop]
393-
lemma continuous_mul (D : Type*) [Ring D] [Algebra R D] [Module.Finite R D] [TopologicalSpace D]
393+
theorem continuous_mul (D : Type*) [Ring D] [Algebra R D] [Module.Finite R D] [TopologicalSpace D]
394394
[IsModuleTopology R D] : Continuous (fun ab ↦ ab.1 * ab.2 : D × D → D) := by
395395
letI : TopologicalSpace (D ⊗[R] D) := moduleTopology R _
396396
haveI : IsModuleTopology R (D ⊗[R] D) := { isModuleTopology' := rfl }
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ def Module.topologicalRing : TopologicalRing D where
403403

404404
end commutative
405405

406-
lemma continuousSMul (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalRing R]
406+
theorem continuousSMul (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalRing R]
407407
(A : Type*) [AddCommGroup A] [Module R A] [Module.Finite R A] [TopologicalSpace A]
408408
[IsModuleTopology R A] :
409409
ContinuousSMul R A := by
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ I can only prove that `SMul : R × A → A` is continuous for the module topolog
420420
commutative (because my proof uses tensor products) and if `A` is finite (because
421421
I reduce to a basis check ). Is it true in general? I'm assuming not.
422422
423-
lemma continuousSMul (R : Type*) [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalRing R]
423+
theorem continuousSMul (R : Type*) [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalRing R]
424424
(A : Type*) [AddCommGroup A] [Module R A] : @ContinuousSMul R A _ _ (moduleTopology R A) := by
425425
refine @ContinuousSMul.mk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
426426
haveI : IsModuleTopology R R := inferInstance

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)