You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’m in a CMIP harmonization call, and looking at some of the interfaces for emissions -> SCMs. One issue that may come up is hector wanting some ore specific LULUC input that won’t be available from the CMIP process (where it looks like only the old-style net LULUC CO2 emissions will be provided.).
The issue of CO2 carbonization from cement just came up as well. Do we have that pinned as a potential issue to address from either the GCAM or hector side? Ideally we should include that in our modeling - I don’t have an opinion at this point if this better to do in GCAM and adjust the CO2 passed to hector or do this on the hector side (If not we should flag that for discussion.). It's a separate line item now in the global carbon budget.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For context, here is the magnitude of the cement carbonation sink since 2000 (from GCP 2023). These represent a flux from the atmosphere to land. Historical values we have from GCP, but part of the issue will also be how to calculate these for the future using GCAM data, so there's a GCAM linking question as well.
Email from @ssmithClimate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: