You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the main results table, the datasets aren't ordered by any field. This can be frustrating for users hoping to quickly navigate around the table pages. One suggestion was to order by the most recent events. I like this because anyone visiting will see how up to date the database is and it gives a clear ordering.
Hurdles may be query times. We're only fetching 20/50/100 results at a time. Sorting these is quick and easy-but may give inconsistent results when the next query at OFFSET 20/5/100 is made. Realistically, it might involve ordering all of the results which will most likely take far too long.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a situation where a graph database can't do a great job but ElasticSearch can. I'd probably dig into that. We already index all phenomenonTime triples in ES, for example.
In the main results table, the datasets aren't ordered by any field. This can be frustrating for users hoping to quickly navigate around the table pages. One suggestion was to order by the most recent events. I like this because anyone visiting will see how up to date the database is and it gives a clear ordering.
Hurdles may be query times. We're only fetching 20/50/100 results at a time. Sorting these is quick and easy-but may give inconsistent results when the next query at OFFSET 20/5/100 is made. Realistically, it might involve ordering all of the results which will most likely take far too long.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: