Issue overview
The attached file uses a DesignSpecification:ZoneHVAC:Sizing to size the airflow of window air conditioners using a heating/cooling fraction of autosized heating/cooling supply air flow rate of 0.5.
The EIO shows that the maximum air flow rate for the window AC is 50% of the fan's:
Component Sizing Information, Fan:OnOff, WINDOWACFAN_1, Design Size Maximum Flow Rate [m3/s], 0.67551
Component Sizing Information, ZoneHVAC:WindowAirConditioner, WINDOWAC, User-Specified (scaled by fractional multiplier) Maximum Supply Air Flow Rate [m3/s], 0.33776
Simulation output shows that when the fan is running at the expected flow rate (0.33776 m3/s), the fan runtime fraction is 0.5 which seems to imply that actually for that reported timestep the flow is 0.33776 / 0.5 = 0.67551 m3/s. I don't think that this is the case (I switch to a Fan:ConstantVolume and saw the same airflow reported) and the 0.5 probably comes from the fact that the fan maximum flow rate is greater than the maximum flow rate from the window AC. If that the case, shouldn't the reported fan runtime fraction be 1?
Details
Some additional details for this issue (if relevant):
- Platform: Windows
- Version of EnergyPlus: Latest develop (24.2)
Checklist
Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.
Issue overview
The attached file uses a
DesignSpecification:ZoneHVAC:Sizingto size the airflow of window air conditioners using a heating/cooling fraction of autosized heating/cooling supply air flow rate of 0.5.The EIO shows that the maximum air flow rate for the window AC is 50% of the fan's:
Simulation output shows that when the fan is running at the expected flow rate (0.33776 m3/s), the fan runtime fraction is 0.5 which seems to imply that actually for that reported timestep the flow is 0.33776 / 0.5 = 0.67551 m3/s. I don't think that this is the case (I switch to a
Fan:ConstantVolumeand saw the same airflow reported) and the 0.5 probably comes from the fact that the fan maximum flow rate is greater than the maximum flow rate from the window AC. If that the case, shouldn't the reported fan runtime fraction be 1?Details
Some additional details for this issue (if relevant):
Checklist
Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.
Plus Defect Complexity (Github Project)