We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be very helpful to have input validation backed in as a check and a layer of documentation for all HOPP and GreenHEART input files.
We could do this like WISDEM (https://github.com/WISDEM/WISDEM/tree/master/wisdem/inputs), including default input yaml schemas. We could also do it like FLORIS (https://github.com/NREL/floris) with the attrs class.
Right now we are reliant on example yamls, but the examples do not always get updated with code changes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Add input file validation
It would be very helpful to have input validation backed in as a check and a layer of documentation for all HOPP and GreenHEART input files.
Proposed solution
We could do this like WISDEM (https://github.com/WISDEM/WISDEM/tree/master/wisdem/inputs), including default input yaml schemas. We could also do it like FLORIS (https://github.com/NREL/floris) with the attrs class.
Alternatives considered
Right now we are reliant on example yamls, but the examples do not always get updated with code changes
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: