You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
unify om_capacity parameter across all tech including battery
As a holdover from the initial implementation of the custom financial model, and I believe from pySAM, the battery financial has a different name for the om_capacity, om_batt_capacity_cost.
Proposed solution
Ideally we would have a unified name for this, just om_capacity or om_capacity_cost regardless of technology.
Alternatives considered
Currently both om_capacity and om_batt_capacity_cost are set for battery.
Additional context
Some discussion on this from PR #355. @dguittet originally implemented the custom financial model and will likely have some insight on a good solution for HOPP.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
unify
om_capacity
parameter across all tech including batteryAs a holdover from the initial implementation of the custom financial model, and I believe from pySAM, the battery financial has a different name for the
om_capacity
,om_batt_capacity_cost
.Proposed solution
Ideally we would have a unified name for this, just
om_capacity
orom_capacity_cost
regardless of technology.Alternatives considered
Currently both
om_capacity
andom_batt_capacity_cost
are set for battery.Additional context
Some discussion on this from PR #355. @dguittet originally implemented the custom financial model and will likely have some insight on a good solution for HOPP.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: