Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove SGBD from image #789

Closed
AR2000AR opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

Remove SGBD from image #789

AR2000AR opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@AR2000AR
Copy link

SGBDs like postrgesql should not be in the server image. They should be hosted in a other container. This is usually done with a docker-compose file. This would reduce the image size, and allow sys admins to reuse a existing server while giving the main image non admin credentials.

@igwyd
Copy link
Member

igwyd commented Feb 4, 2025

Hello @AR2000AR. Many users use the embedded database, so we don't plan to remove it from the image. But you can use a separate database, example docker-compose.yml.

@AR2000AR
Copy link
Author

AR2000AR commented Feb 4, 2025

Does changing the DB_HOST disable the built in database ? The goal in doing that is to reduce the RAM load by starting one less instance of the SGBD.

@igwyd
Copy link
Member

igwyd commented Feb 25, 2025

Yes, the postgresql in the container is turned off when using an external database.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants