Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

readme: improve the readme images and badges #886

Closed
2 of 4 tasks
jaiakash opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #902
Closed
2 of 4 tasks

readme: improve the readme images and badges #886

jaiakash opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #902
Assignees

Comments

@jaiakash
Copy link
Contributor

jaiakash commented Feb 18, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current readme badges look simple.

Describe the solution you'd like
We can improve the readme with appropriate badges and images.

  • Center header and badges.
  • Add OWASP Nest logo.
  • Add modern-looking (see screenshot's last row badges) badges instead of flat badges.
  • Fix build status badge. (its run-ci-cd.yaml not ci-cd.yaml)

Suggestions/Clarifications

  • Keep issues, PRs, last commit and contributor badges.
  • Remove forks and stars since it's already visible on the GitHub page. Your thoughts?
  • Remove languages since it's already visible on the GitHub page. Your thoughts?
  • What is use of owasp code badge (top center badge)?

Are you going to work on fixing this?
Yes

Additional context
Screenshot:
Image

@jaiakash
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let me know your suggestions ?

Fork: https://github.com/jaiakash/Nest/tree/revamp-readme-stats

@Raghavg18
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @arkid15r assign

@jaiakash
Copy link
Contributor Author

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in Project Nest Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants