-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Different slabs for the same miller index #12
Comments
There could be multiple slabs for a miller index because of different shifts and if the top and bottom aren't symmetric. No. of layers should be the same though; let us know if you find otherwise. |
That definitely looks buggy, especially the gap between some of the layers.. Could you share the atoms object for @mshuaibii any thoughts? |
@gihanpanapitiya Where did you create |
Thanks! The issue can be reproduced using the following code.
|
I see. Yeah, it looks like you've created a 111 surface, and then are feeding that into the Slab creator, which is not the correct use case. You should feed in a bulk structure, as follows:
If you are interested in other bulk structures, you can look for them in the following database - https://github.com/Open-Catalyst-Project/Open-Catalyst-Dataset/blob/main/ocdata/databases/pkls/bulks.pkl. |
If we want to use a bulk not in |
We would like to use our own slabs to find the heuristic placements. Is the method below a valid way to use
|
I am following the example at adsorbml_walkthrough.ipynb. Do you know why we get different slabs for the same miller index? I want to select the slab that has the same number of layers as that of the bulk. Is there a way to do this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: