Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to make data files more user friendly #34

Open
jjkoehorst opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Option to make data files more user friendly #34

jjkoehorst opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@jjkoehorst
Copy link

jjkoehorst commented May 23, 2023

For downstream processing or reusability of crates it would be great to have a human readable structure.
Currently it uses the checksums that were provided by CWLProv and the output there is not very friendly:

Screenshot 2023-05-23 at 10 47 53

This then results in a more combined structure in RO-Crate but if I would need a specific file for further processing in R for example I first need to process the JSON file before I would be able to identify the files. It also does not allow for browsing through the files and folders that is very useful if the data objects are shared among peers to get a better feeling of the data and structure without the need of fancy tooling to do this for you.

Screenshot 2023-05-23 at 10 45 58

Which in turn does not really reflect the output

Screenshot 2023-05-23 at 12 29 33
@simleo
Copy link
Collaborator

simleo commented Jun 1, 2023

See #46. It offers a simple solution that may, however, lead to incorrect representations in case of clashes.

@jjkoehorst
Copy link
Author

jjkoehorst commented Jun 22, 2023

It's getting close! :) will check if the following structure is due to workflow output or something gets flattened.
Will let you know. The data folder was something I added #55

Screenshot 2023-06-22 at 20 27 53

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants