Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add mapping to the E-Santé Adapter #13143

Closed
1 task
markusmann-vg opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed
1 task

Add mapping to the E-Santé Adapter #13143

markusmann-vg opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature A new feature to be developed (ticket type) qa-verified Issue has been tested and verified by QA

Comments

@markusmann-vg
Copy link

markusmann-vg commented Sep 4, 2024

Feature Description

- Add date of result

Added Value/Benefit

another value that is automatically prefilled and does not have to be added manually

Acceptance Criteria

  • Map "date of result" to the according SORMAS value

Implementation Details

No response

Mockups

No response

Additional Information

No response

@markusmann-vg markusmann-vg added the feature A new feature to be developed (ticket type) label Sep 4, 2024
@XavCol
Copy link

XavCol commented Sep 17, 2024

Hi,
For the "Date of result": in the metadata excel file sheet SARS it is mentioned as Diagnostic date:
Diagnostic date ("when the biologist validates the result"): as the identification of the disease is done at the section level, we propose to add this date on the section, via the author (but without repeating the information about the author). For XSD validation reasons, we have to keep the tags even if they are empty

@XavCol
Copy link

XavCol commented Sep 17, 2024

I have this sentence too:
Diagnostic date: mandatory, but if not present, the diagnostic date is approximated by the document date (ClinicalDocument/effectiveTime) = the result date

@leventegal-she
Copy link
Contributor

leventegal-she commented Sep 24, 2024

@XavCol @markusmann-vg
For the Diagnostic date value we need information about how to parse from a CDA xml: tag path, code etc.

What does approximated mean in your above sentence: * the diagnostic date is approximated by the document date*?
Should we set the result date as diagnostic date or it should have a some days difference?

@XavCol
Copy link

XavCol commented Sep 24, 2024

@leventegal-she
For Covid, Diagnostic date = the result date
this date is the time value on the section, via author :
If not present, then use the clinicalDocument/effectiveTime

 <author>
                        <time value="20190302"/>
                        <assignedAuthor>
                                   <id/>
                        </assignedAuthor> 
            </author>
            <entry>………..
```     

@leventegal-she
Copy link
Contributor

@XavCol

Do we need a another called Diagnostic date in SORMAS or we just need to map this date from the CDA xml into the Date of result field of the pathogen test?

@XavCol
Copy link

XavCol commented Sep 30, 2024

@XavCol

Do we need a another called Diagnostic date in SORMAS or we just need to map this date from the CDA xml into the Date of result field of the pathogen test?

@leventegal-she we can simply map it to Date of result

@leventegal-she
Copy link
Contributor

The work is linked to Map date of result #2

This ticket can be closed after the above one is closed

@markusmann-vg
Copy link
Author

@markusmann-vg markusmann-vg changed the title [INCOMPLETE] Add mapping to the E-Santé Adapter Add mapping to the E-Santé Adapter Oct 1, 2024
@richardbartha
Copy link
Contributor

@richardbartha richardbartha added the qa-verified Issue has been tested and verified by QA label Oct 9, 2024
@markusmann-vg markusmann-vg added this to the Sprint 2 - 1.99.0 milestone Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature A new feature to be developed (ticket type) qa-verified Issue has been tested and verified by QA
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants