You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
What do you think about adding role type to pid check? In the current state, you can launch a "hub" type, then set it to status stopped with type "node". This seems unsafe.
If you like the idea, I have a PR ready to go, just have to write some tests and docs. I have tested my code functionally and it works great - can start/stop a hub and node on the same machine independently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What do you think about adding role type to pid check? In the current state, you can launch a "hub" type, then set it to status stopped with type "node". This seems unsafe.
If you like the idea, I have a PR ready to go, just have to write some tests and docs. I have tested my code functionally and it works great - can start/stop a hub and node on the same machine independently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: