functions and the compiler #2393
penta-quark-neutro
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
there isn't a supported api for compiling extension blocks currently |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
So there's no way to inject code or something like that into the compiler? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
From what I understand about how compiling uses extension code, it's quite simple; you just place a function that would be the block. But I'm wondering, is there a way to place code directly instead of a function?
Like, to put "a>>b" directly instead of a function, just to do the same thing.
Well, I don't really know how the compiler works, and something like that could easily cause problems with updates.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions