Fun Fact Voids™ - do these still exist in R8?

[johyphenel]

IMO the changes from #10 do not make it any more clear what someone should do to print these correctly.

1. It would be great to have screenshots from a slicer (doesn't matter which) of what the voids should look like when sliced correctly.
2. Fun Fact Voids™ #10 references tweaking "gap closing radius" or similar in slicers to make these voids show — the manual should include this along with a suggested value.
3. It's not clear to me that this advice actually works..? (see below)

The manual shows the Tap_Front part when giving the fun fact — so I'm trying with Tap_Front_r8.stl. In Orca slicer, setting Slice gap closing radius to 0.0, 0.02, or 0.049 (my profile default) seems to make no difference (and I don't think I see the voids?).

Using Ellis' preferred version of SuperSlicer & his current configs on github gives similar results:

[Piolie]

I compared the very first step file (r1) with the latest version (r8) and noticed that the number of ribs has been significantly reduced. I haven't investigated the reason why. My slicer profile uses the same 0.049 default value for the Slice gap closing radius, and it appears to generate those two ribs as expected. Your results look just like mine.

The picture in the manual should probably be updated.

r1:

r8:

Orca: