diff --git a/lib/active_hash/base.rb b/lib/active_hash/base.rb
index ab43762..4bffad2 100644
--- a/lib/active_hash/base.rb
+++ b/lib/active_hash/base.rb
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ class Base
     class_attribute :_data, :dirty, :default_attributes, :scopes
 
     if Object.const_defined?(:ActiveModel)
+      extend ActiveModel::Naming
       extend ActiveModel::Translation
       include ActiveModel::Conversion
     else
diff --git a/spec/active_hash/base_spec.rb b/spec/active_hash/base_spec.rb
index 4ff3099..c268815 100644
--- a/spec/active_hash/base_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/active_hash/base_spec.rb
@@ -1732,6 +1732,17 @@ class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
 
   end
 
+  describe "#model_name" do
+    # This test reproduces the issue reported in https://github.com/active-hash/active_hash/pull/335,
+    # regarding whether ActiveHash (and its derived models) expose `#model_name`.
+    # Some serializers (e.g., okuramasafumi/alba) use the `#model_name` method internally,
+    # so this test ensures that a NoMethodError is not raised.
+    it "exposes model_name correctly" do
+      instance = Country.new(:id => 1)
+      expect { instance.model_name }.not_to raise_error
+    end
+  end
+
   describe ".transaction" do
 
     it "execute the block given to it" do