You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The example given in the seminar does not work as intended. It gives the following warring/error (I'm not sure since it still prints the final state) :
line 10:10 no viable alternative at input 'forallyin{1..6}if(ybelongsTo'
s1 = { 1 .. 5 }; s2 = { 2, 4, 6, 7 }; a = s1 U s2 ; b = s1 ^ s2; c = s1 \ s2; x = 0; forall y in s2 x = x + y; d = emptySet; forall y in { 1 .. 6 } if (y belongsTo s2) d = d U { y };
The correct way of doing this seems to have changed to using 'in': if (y in s2) d = d U { y };
The language manual needs to be updated to reflect this change as well as any code examples used in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The example given in the seminar does not work as intended. It gives the following warring/error (I'm not sure since it still prints the final state) :
s1 = { 1 .. 5 }; s2 = { 2, 4, 6, 7 }; a = s1 U s2 ; b = s1 ^ s2; c = s1 \ s2; x = 0; forall y in s2 x = x + y; d = emptySet; forall y in { 1 .. 6 } if (y belongsTo s2) d = d U { y };
The correct way of doing this seems to have changed to using 'in':
if (y in s2) d = d U { y };
The language manual needs to be updated to reflect this change as well as any code examples used in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: