Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Add namespace in java client #660

Open
1 task done
drpmma opened this issue Dec 29, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #661 or #671
Open
1 task done

[Enhancement] Add namespace in java client #660

drpmma opened this issue Dec 29, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #661 or #671
Assignees
Labels
no stale This will never be considered stale question Further information is requested type/enhancement

Comments

@drpmma
Copy link
Contributor

drpmma commented Dec 29, 2023

Before Creating the Enhancement Request

  • I have confirmed that this should be classified as an enhancement rather than a bug/feature.

Programming Language of the Client

Java

Summary

Add namespace in java client.

Motivation

For the purpose for the future namespace feature.

Describe the Solution You'd Like

Add namespace in ClientConfiguration.

Describe Alternatives You've Considered

No

Additional Context

No response

@drpmma drpmma self-assigned this Dec 29, 2023
drpmma added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2024
* Add namespace for java client

* Add checkNotNull
drpmma added a commit to drpmma/rocketmq-clients that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2024
@lizhanhui lizhanhui reopened this Mar 10, 2024
@lizhanhui
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of "For the purpose for the future namespace feature"?
Are you guys planning to add multi-tenant support to proxy/gateway?
What is the plan for other bindings out there?
@drpmma

@lizhanhui lizhanhui added no stale This will never be considered stale question Further information is requested labels Mar 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no stale This will never be considered stale question Further information is requested type/enhancement
Projects
None yet
2 participants