Skip to content

[FEATURE] AsyncAPI 3.1 support? #2560

Description

@matthew-inamdar

Why do we need this improvement?

This doesn't seem to support AsyncAPI 3.1 specifications, and I can't see any discussions about it. Is there official support yet?

How will this change help?

It would be great to use AsyncAPI 3.1 specs.

Screenshots

No response

How could it be implemented/designed?

N/A

🚧 Breaking changes

No

👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?

  • I checked and didn't find a similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

Are you willing to work on this issue?

None

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions