Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal 0005] Allow labellers to have custom report flows #63

Open
heikadog opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Proposal 0005] Allow labellers to have custom report flows #63

heikadog opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@heikadog
Copy link

heikadog commented Oct 2, 2024

It's been occasionally mentioned in Ozone issues like this, but I feel like this proposal would be much more successful if moderation labellers could have their own report flows. (e.g. someone could report to a moderation labeller for transphobia or something.) From talking to several people, I've found that people tend to accidentally send reports to my moderation labeller because the report flow looks the same for everything, including the Bluesky moderation service. Anti-Alf Aktion even got a report for CSAM, so at this point, with how many users are on the site now, it could potentially save people from trauma and get more people to understand and use labellers.

@bnewbold
Copy link
Contributor

bnewbold commented Oct 2, 2024

Yup! This is definitely on our radar, as part of an iteration on reporting flows. Labelers should be able to indicate what type of reports they can handle (either linked to specific label values, or as broad universal categories), and also able to opt out of receiving reports in general. There are also some design decisions around whether to support fanning out reports to multiple services in a single submission, or to require sending individual reports to individual services manually.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants