Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

encapsulating entities: user model #850

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

salmanja
Copy link
Contributor

@salmanja salmanja commented Feb 24, 2025

Describe your changes

Briefly describe the changes you made and their purpose.

Issue number

Resolves #815

Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review:

  • I deployed the code locally.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have included the issue # in the PR.
  • I have labelled the PR correctly.
  • The issue I am working on is assigned to me.
  • I didn't use any hardcoded values (otherwise it will not scale, and will make it difficult to maintain consistency across the application).
  • I made sure font sizes, color choices etc are all referenced from the theme.
  • My PR is granular and targeted to one specific feature.
  • I took a screenshot or a video and attached to this PR if there is a UI change.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced user account management by refining how essential account details are handled. Core user information is now clearly defined with required fields and additional details are managed automatically, ensuring a smoother and more secure account experience.
    • Updated user object structure for better type safety and consistency in the application.

@salmanja salmanja self-assigned this Feb 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Walkthrough

A new User type has been added to the codebase. The type definition includes properties such as name, surname, and email as required fields, while other fields like id, password_hash, role, created_at, and last_login are marked as optional. Additionally, the handleDeleteVendor function in the Vendors component has been updated to use the new User type, ensuring consistency and type safety in the user object representation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Clients/.../User.ts Introduces a new User type with required fields (name, surname, email) and optional fields (id, password_hash, role, created_at, last_login).
Clients/.../Vendors/index.tsx Updates handleDeleteVendor function to use the User type, changing id from string to number and renaming firstname and lastname to name and surname.

Poem

I'm a rabbit in the code garden, hopping with glee,
Adding a User type as happy as can be.
Fields prance along, both required and light,
With optional details making the design just right.
I nibble on carrots and bytes with delight,
Celebrating changes that shine ever so bright!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Clients/src/domain/User.ts (2)

1-10: Consider using an interface with JSDoc documentation.

While the type definition is well-structured, consider using an interface instead of a type alias for better extensibility and adding JSDoc documentation for improved IDE support.

+/**
+ * Represents a user in the system.
+ * @interface User
+ */
-export type User = {
+export interface User {
     id?: number; //automatically created by database
     name: string; //will be filled by user
     surname: string; //will be filled by user
     email: string; //will be filled by user
     password_hash?: string; //created by the database
     role?: number; //will be filled by user
     created_at?: Date; //automatically filled by database
     last_login?: Date; //automatically filled by database
-};
+}

2-9: Enhance field documentation with JSDoc.

Convert inline comments to JSDoc format for better documentation and IDE support.

 export interface User {
-    id?: number; //automatically created by database
+    /** Unique identifier automatically generated by the database */
+    id?: PositiveInteger;
-    name: string; //will be filled by user
+    /** User's first name */
+    name: string;
-    surname: string; //will be filled by user
+    /** User's last name */
+    surname: string;
-    email: string; //will be filled by user
+    /** User's email address used for authentication */
+    email: EmailAddress;
-    password_hash?: string; //created by the database
+    /** Hashed password stored in the database */
+    password_hash?: string;
-    role?: number; //will be filled by user
+    /** User's role determining their permissions */
+    role?: UserRole;
-    created_at?: Date; //automatically filled by database
+    /** Timestamp when the user account was created */
+    created_at?: Date;
-    last_login?: Date; //automatically filled by database
+    /** Timestamp of the user's most recent login */
+    last_login?: Date;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e753b5 and 1318f2f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Clients/src/domain/User.ts (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +2 to +9
id?: number; //automatically created by database
name: string; //will be filled by user
surname: string; //will be filled by user
email: string; //will be filled by user
password_hash?: string; //created by the database
role?: number; //will be filled by user
created_at?: Date; //automatically filled by database
last_login?: Date; //automatically filled by database
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Strengthen type safety with more specific types.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Define role as an enum instead of number
  2. Use a custom type for email validation
  3. Add constraints for ID (positive integers)
+/** User role in the system */
+export enum UserRole {
+    ADMIN = 1,
+    USER = 2,
+    // Add other roles as needed
+}
+
+/** Email address string type with basic validation */
+type EmailAddress = string & { __brand: 'EmailAddress' };
+
+/** Positive integer type for IDs */
+type PositiveInteger = number & { __brand: 'PositiveInteger' };
+
 export interface User {
-    id?: number;
+    id?: PositiveInteger;
     name: string;
     surname: string;
-    email: string;
+    email: EmailAddress;
     password_hash?: string;
-    role?: number;
+    role?: UserRole;
     created_at?: Date;
     last_login?: Date;
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
id?: number; //automatically created by database
name: string; //will be filled by user
surname: string; //will be filled by user
email: string; //will be filled by user
password_hash?: string; //created by the database
role?: number; //will be filled by user
created_at?: Date; //automatically filled by database
last_login?: Date; //automatically filled by database
/** User role in the system */
export enum UserRole {
ADMIN = 1,
USER = 2,
// Add other roles as needed
}
/** Email address string type with basic validation */
type EmailAddress = string & { __brand: 'EmailAddress' };
/** Positive integer type for IDs */
type PositiveInteger = number & { __brand: 'PositiveInteger' };
export interface User {
id?: PositiveInteger; //automatically created by database
name: string; //will be filled by user
surname: string; //will be filled by user
email: EmailAddress; //will be filled by user
password_hash?: string; //created by the database
role?: UserRole; //will be filled by user
created_at?: Date; //automatically filled by database
last_login?: Date; //automatically filled by database
}

Comment on lines +1 to +10
export type User = {
id?: number; //automatically created by database
name: string; //will be filled by user
surname: string; //will be filled by user
email: string; //will be filled by user
password_hash?: string; //created by the database
role?: number; //will be filled by user
created_at?: Date; //automatically filled by database
last_login?: Date; //automatically filled by database
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Address security concerns in the User type.

  1. Consider removing password_hash from the User type to prevent accidental exposure. Create a separate type for authentication-related fields.
  2. Add validation patterns for email and name fields.
+/** Validation patterns for user fields */
+const USER_VALIDATION = {
+    EMAIL_PATTERN: /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/,
+    NAME_PATTERN: /^[a-zA-Z\s-']{2,50}$/,
+} as const;
+
+/** Type for authentication-related fields */
+interface UserAuth {
+    email: EmailAddress;
+    password_hash: string;
+}
+
 export interface User {
     id?: PositiveInteger;
     name: string;
     surname: string;
     email: EmailAddress;
-    password_hash?: string;
     role?: UserRole;
     created_at?: Date;
     last_login?: Date;
 }

@salmanja
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 10 48 37 PM

@gorkemcetin

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/Vendors/index.tsx (2)

102-107: User object properly typed but consider improving default values.

The user object is now correctly typed as User, which improves type safety. However, using "N/A" as placeholder values and 0 as a default ID might not be ideal.

Consider using more meaningful defaults or handling the case where user data isn't available differently:

  const user : User = {
-   id: Number(localStorage.getItem("userId")) || 0,
+   id: Number(localStorage.getItem("userId")) || -1, // Using -1 to indicate no valid ID
    email: "N/A",
    name: "N/A",
    surname: "N/A",
  };

154-159: Duplicated user object structure in error logging.

This is a duplicate of the user object structure used in the previous error logging block. Consider extracting this to a helper function to avoid duplication.

Extract the user mapping logic to a reusable function:

+ const getUserForLogging = (user: User) => ({
+   id: String(user.id),
+   email: user.email ?? "N/A",
+   firstname: user.name,
+   lastname: user.surname,
+ });

  logEngine({
    type: "error",
    message: `An error occurred: ${error}`,
-   user : {
-     id: String(user.id),
-     email: user.email ?? "N/A",
-     firstname: user.name,
-     lastname: user.surname,
-   },
+   user: getUserForLogging(user),
  });

This would also need to be applied to the previous logEngine call.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1318f2f and a4f164c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Clients/src/presentation/pages/Vendors/index.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/Vendors/index.tsx (2)

25-25: Good addition of the User type import.

Adding the User type from the domain layer is a good step toward proper encapsulation and type safety.


141-146: Property name mismatch between User model and logging.

There's a mismatch between the User model properties (name/surname) and the logging structure (firstname/lastname).

This suggests the logging system might expect a different user structure than what's defined in the User model. Verify whether this mapping is intentional and if the logging system needs to be updated to match the new User model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Extracting Domain Entities
1 participant