Retro review rpa docs

[giorgionaps]

Description

Retro review of RPA docs.
Closes #7356

When should this change go live?

• This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support. (add bug or support label)
• This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week. (add available & undocumented label)
• This is on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the Documentation team. (create draft PR and/or add hold label)
• This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (add alpha or minor label)
• There is no urgency with this change (add low prio label)

PR Checklist

• The commit history of this PR is cleaned up, using {type}(scope): {description} commit message(s)

• My changes are for an upcoming minor release and are in the /docs directory (version 8.9).
• My changes are for an already released minor and are in a /versioned_docs directory.

• I added a DRI, team, or delegate as a reviewer for technical accuracy and grammar/style:
  • Engineering team review
  • Technical writer review via @camunda/tech-writers unless working with an embedded writer.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[github-actions]

👋 🤖 🤔 Hello, @mesellings! Did you make your changes in all the right places?

These files were changed only in docs/. You might want to duplicate these changes in versioned_docs/version-8.8/.

• docs/components/rpa/getting-started.md
• docs/components/rpa/overview.md
• docs/components/rpa/production.md

You may have done this intentionally, but we wanted to point it out in case you didn't. You can read more about the versioning within our docs in our documentation guidelines.

[mesellings]

Thanks @giorgionaps - I made a few other edits, but think this is good to get some approval from the RPA team now before we backport any changes 🚀

[mesellings]

@marstamm we are just doing a retro review on the RPA docs to standardise them with our other docs a bit more - requested your review if you wanted to check you are happy with the changes first? 🙏

[marstamm]

Thank you @giorgionaps and @mesellings ! I will have a look into this on Monday 👀

[marstamm]

Thank you for the rework, this looks all good from the technical side and reads much nicer 🥇

[mesellings]

Thanks @giorgionaps please backport the changes as required, you can do that in this PR or a separate one if you want? Nice work! 🚀