Zettelkasten/BASB/Gardening Quasi-Obsidian/Wiki notes

[TomLucidor]

There are a lot of keywords that introduces depth of thinking by the following MCPs https://github.com/entanglr/zettelkasten-mcp?tab=readme-ov-file#link-types https://github.com/joshylchen/zettelkasten?tab=readme-ov-file#link-types https://github.com/jrswab/slipbot?tab=readme-ov-file#how-linking-works

• Reference (symmetric relations)
• Extend (synthesis of existing info)
• Refine (clarification and specification)
• Contradict (showing how ideas conflict)
• Question (proposing options and hypotheses)
• Support (tacking on evidence for idea)
• Related (miscellaneous)

Something missing here is note confidence (or epistemic humility ratings per note), that seems to be very important as well. Others would try to include temporal decay but I am not too confident about it https://github.com/prefrontal-systems/cortexgraph?tab=readme-ov-file#core-algorithm

[TomLucidor]

P.S. Fort atomic note prompting and what it leads to https://github.com/disnet/flint-note-mcp https://github.com/disnet/flint-note

And quality control COULD look like this https://github.com/tobs-code/a-mem-mcp-server?tab=readme-ov-file#memory-enzymes-workflow https://github.com/legendaryvibecoder/gigabrain

[TomLucidor]

A bit of a bonus conversation on reference topologies anomalyco/opencode#23628 (comment)