We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I would like more feature parity with Django when comes to relations especially generic relations and one to one relations. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/ref/contrib/contenttypes/#generic-relations https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/topics/db/examples/one_to_one/#one-to-one-relationships
Describe the solution you'd like I would like an implementation of generic relations and one to one relations or a constrain to ForeignKey field
Describe alternatives you've considered I tired to implement it with Inheritance but then the reverse relation has a different name for each model.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like more feature parity with Django when comes to relations especially generic relations and one to one relations.
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/ref/contrib/contenttypes/#generic-relations
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/topics/db/examples/one_to_one/#one-to-one-relationships
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like an implementation of generic relations and one to one relations or a constrain to ForeignKey field
Describe alternatives you've considered
I tired to implement it with Inheritance but then the reverse relation has a different name for each model.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: