-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create Cylc Wikipedia article #24
Comments
Good idea @kinow At a minimum, I think the article should explain how "cycling" is different from real time scheduling, and how Cylc treats cycling workflows as never-ending single workflows (without loops/cycles) in which the tasks repeat; and it should mention production forecasting use at NIWA and Met Office etc. Presumably I can't edit in your sandbox? |
(huh, maybe I can edit your draft). |
That would be great if you can. You would probably be the best to explain the history, and its features :) And if you prefer to write down in some word/opendocument/txt/markdown/gist/etc I can grab it and convert to Wikipedia's syntax 👍 |
(we should do this once 8.0.0 has been released) |
(I see Bruno's sandbox page still exists). |
Hi,
When searching for Cylc on search engines, some of the top results (with privacy filters) include Cylc links. But Google and other search engines give Wikipedia articles a high rank in the result hits.
Other tools such as Emacs, PBS, SLURM, have already pages. And when searching for some terms, Google - for instance - will display extra information retrieved from Wikipedia.
I started a draft for Cylc some time ago, and had another go at it now over these long holidays: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brunodepaulak/sandbox. It's normal to use a sandbox when preparing a new page. If we decide to go ahead with it, myself or somebody else would have to submit it to review/approval, before it gets published.
After that, searching for Cylc should bring our results with a slight advantage. Plus, personally I like Wikipedia articles for its flatness, so that I can check information about a project without having to dig into its website (guess that was the idea of DOAP).
Cheers
Bruno
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: