find_min_global don't find the best minimum #3051
Julien-Livet
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 3 comments
-
10ms isn't very long. This isn't a super fast solver. Does it work if you let it run a lot longer? This solver isn't what I would recommend if speed is what you need. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It is the same result with 1s. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Usually, when I am unsure of the run time, I use the overload with auto const result{dlib::find_min_global(f, bound1, bound2, dlib::max_function_calls(10000))}; But I am still unable to find the result you want to find, even with 10000 calls. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I write a function that I want to find the minimum value. It works for the first iteration but the second, find_min_global found a min of 2.38356e-14 with p,q,lnbetan = (117,9,4.10725) whereas the best mininum is 2.30677e-14 with p,q,lnbetan = (103, 7, 3.94938993840887).
Is there some parameter of find_min_global to tune to solve this problem?
Here is the code.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions