-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fedora 33] Installation via .rpm written over during system upgrade #11
Comments
Hi @BenjaminCronin I think you're right that the only option is to change the distribution name... since that I haven't heard of the |
I've been thinking of different package names that might maintain the short length while not conflicting with other existing packages, which I'll try to list below. peercp (my favorite that I've come up with) One other thing I was thinking of is something along the lines of apt, where you have apt-get and apt-cache, and also the wrapper apt itself, having maybe pcp-send and pcp-receive as wrappers for longer names that won't interfere with other projects |
wanted to jump in and say this is also the case with apt. upon running
|
When upgrading the system using the command
sudo dnf upgrade
, the pcp package is written over by this packagewhich renders this pcp no longer accessible or installed (not quite sure what happens to the package).
Current workaround is to uninstall that pcp using
sudo dnf remove pcp
and then re-install this pcp with standard software installation from either command line of Gnome software.Perhaps changing the distribution name of this package to something along the lines of pcp-filetransfer (?) would fix this issue, at least on Fedora.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: