Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Moving to discussions to discuss possible regexes. Note that dunst uses the following line to compile the regex: You can take a look at |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I am pretty sure |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Issue description
I use batsignal to notify of a low battery on my laptop.
Dunstrc has two sections - for all notifications excluding the batsignal application and for the batsignal application itself.
With regex excluding only the batsignal application, dust writes in the log
WARNING: Invalid preceding regular expression: "^(?!batsignal).*$"and does not process my script from "all" section.
If I remove the rule, then when receiving a notification from batsignal, both my scripts from the All and batsignal sections are processed, respectively.
Installation info
1.9.2 (2023-04-20)extra/dunst (package)i3wmarchlinuxAddition to the standard dunstrc
Is it possible to use exclusionary expressions in the rules?
I want to set the rules for a separate script for one application and one separate script for all the others.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions