We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
现有规范中@constructor的作用是用于标识这是个构造函数,而JSDoc3中@constructor是@class的同义用法,需要指定类名。
@constructor
@class
类名
如果项目中想用JSDoc作为文档化工具,可以不按照规范来么?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
个人感觉jsdoc里关于类型的标注用处不大……还不如直接上typescript/flow的类型标注,反正babel有transform会删掉类型信息。
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
现有规范中
@constructor
的作用是用于标识这是个构造函数,而JSDoc3中@constructor
是@class
的同义用法,需要指定类名
。如果项目中想用JSDoc作为文档化工具,可以不按照规范来么?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: