-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Add LASSO without structure to LinearRegression notebook #203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
The docs build is failing, I guess because I import graphite-maps? Will copy the imported |
|
Not sure why it fails now. I see no error message... Try running locally |
I see I need Java for the docs? (pandoc) Is there no way around this? From checking the CI I see perhaps I import or use something in the notebook that is not part of the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added some comments!
| ### Gaussian conditional marginal | ||
|
|
||
| The joint KLD is a natural objective to evaluate model performance on. | ||
| However, multiple (Kalman) ensemble methods only produce an estiamte $K$ either explicit or explicit, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| However, multiple (Kalman) ensemble methods only produce an estiamte $K$ either explicit or explicit, | |
| However, multiple (Kalman) ensemble methods only produce an estimate $K$ either explicit or implicit, |
Not sure I understand this sentence.
Do you mean that several different ensemble methods only produce an estimate of
What do you mean by explicit / implicit?
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Feda Curic <[email protected]>
Showcases how to resolve equinor/ert#6599
I think the case for LASSO is well argued for there. Unfortunately I do not know of any reference papers doing this.
The case for LASSO can be seen e.g. from
Thus it makes sense to improve upon EnKF and ES ++ by doing Monte Carlo + LASSO (or Ridge or similar).