Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On rigid motion representation #6

Open
blackball opened this issue May 26, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

On rigid motion representation #6

blackball opened this issue May 26, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@blackball
Copy link

Hi,

I simply went through the codes. it's using quaternion and translation to model a rigid transform, and optimize 7 parameters during the icp process.

I think directly updating 4 parameters of quaternion over the optimization process is not correct, although it will still give you a better result in the end (naturally becasue of gradient decedent). In Ceres-Solver, there's a local parameterization for this case (https://github.com/ceres-solver/ceres-solver/blob/master/include/ceres/local_parameterization.h).

Or better way will be using SE(3) to represent the rigid motion and optimizing in se(3) space.

Hope it could help.

@blackball blackball changed the title updating the On rigid motion representation May 26, 2017
@hitimo
Copy link
Contributor

hitimo commented Jun 12, 2017

@blackball Thanks a lot for pointing this out - I agree, this should be updated since a 4-quaternion gives an extra degree of freedom.

@hitimo hitimo self-assigned this Jun 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants