Skip to content

Conversation

@kehemo
Copy link
Collaborator

@kehemo kehemo commented Feb 7, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.12693% with 327 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.31%. Comparing base (421cf74) to head (5c8af6b).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/exo/backend/coverage.py 74.04% 102 Missing ⚠️
src/exo/rewrite/constraint_solver.py 81.69% 78 Missing ⚠️
src/exo/rewrite/chexo.py 81.01% 60 Missing ⚠️
src/exo/backend/LoopIR_transpiler.py 90.79% 59 Missing ⚠️
src/exo/libs/externs.py 43.24% 21 Missing ⚠️
src/exo/rewrite/LoopIR_scheduling.py 82.75% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/exo/core/extern.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/exo/core/internal_cursors.py 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #759      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.34%   87.31%   -1.03%     
==========================================
  Files          93       99       +6     
  Lines       21716    23413    +1697     
==========================================
+ Hits        19185    20444    +1259     
- Misses       2531     2969     +438     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kehemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kehemo commented May 26, 2025

reorganize files so all new chexo related files are in their own folder within rewrite

return forward


@dataclass(frozen=True)
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for stage mem because stage mem needs a way to reference individual reads and writes and know whether each overlaps with the staging window.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants