pep-0394.txt

PEP: 394
Title: The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Kerrick Staley <mail@kerrickstaley.com>,
        Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>,
        Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>,
        Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>,
        Miro Hrončok <miro@hroncok.cz>,
        Carol Willing <willingc@gmail.com>,
Status: Active
Type: Informational
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 02-Mar-2011
Post-History: 04-Mar-2011, 20-Jul-2011, 16-Feb-2012, 30-Sep-2014, 28-Apr-2018,
              26-Jun-2019
Resolution: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116594.html


Abstract
========

This PEP outlines the behavior of Python scripts when the ``python`` command
is invoked.
Depending on a distribution or system configuration,
``python`` may or may not be installed.
If ``python`` is installed its target interpreter may refer to ``python2``
or ``python3``.
End users may be unaware of this inconsistency across Unix-like systems.
This PEP's goal is to reduce user confusion about what ``python`` references
and what will be the script's behavior.

The recommendations in the next section of this PEP will outline the behavior
when:

* using virtual environments
* writing cross-platform scripts with shebangs for either ``python2`` or ``python3``

The PEP's goal is to clarify the behavior for script end users, distribution
providers, and script maintainers / authors.


Recommendation
==============


Our recommendations are detailed below.
We call out any expectations that these recommendations are based upon.

For Python runtime distributors
-------------------------------

* We expect Unix-like software distributions (including systems like macOS and
  Cygwin) to install the ``python2`` command into the default path
  whenever a version of the Python 2 interpreter is installed, and the same
  for ``python3`` and the Python 3 interpreter.
* When  invoked, ``python2`` should run some version of the Python 2
  interpreter, and ``python3`` should run some version of the Python 3
  interpreter.
* If the ``python`` command is installed, it is expected to invoke either
  the same version of Python as the ``python3`` command or as the ``python2``
  command.
* Distributors may choose to set the behavior of the ``python`` command
  as follows:

   * ``python2``,
   * ``python3``,
   * not provide ``python`` command,
   * allow ``python`` to be configurable by an end user or
     a system administrator.

* The Python 3.x ``idle``, ``pydoc``, and ``python-config`` commands should
  likewise be available as ``idle3``, ``pydoc3``, and ``python3-config``;
  Python 2.x versions as ``idle2``, ``pydoc2``, and ``python2-config``.
  The commands with no version number should either invoke the same version
  of Python as the ``python`` command, or not be available at all.
* When packaging third party Python scripts, distributors are encouraged to
  change less specific shebangs to more specific ones.
  This ensures software is used with the latest version of Python available,
  and it can remove a dependency on Python 2.
  The details on what specifics to set are left to the distributors;
  though. Example specifics could include:

  * Changing ``python`` shebangs to ``python3`` when Python 3.x is supported.
  * Changing ``python`` shebangs to ``python2`` when Python 3.x is not yet
    supported.
  * Changing ``python3`` shebangs to ``python3.8`` if the software is built
    with Python 3.8.

* When a virtual environment (created by the PEP 405 ``venv`` package or a
  similar tool such as ``virtualenv`` or ``conda``) is active, the ``python``
  command should refer to the virtual environment's interpreter and should
  always be available.
  The ``python3`` or ``python2`` command (according to the environment's
  interpreter version) should also be available.

For Python script publishers
----------------------------

* When reinvoking the interpreter from a Python script, querying
  ``sys.executable`` to avoid hardcoded assumptions regarding the
  interpreter location remains the preferred approach.
* Encourage your end users to use a virtual environment.
  This makes the user's environment more predictable (possibly resulting
  in fewer issues), and helps avoid disrupting their system.
* For scripts that are only expected to be run in an activated virtual
  environment, shebang lines can be written as ``#!/usr/bin/env python``,
  as this instructs the script to respect the active virtual environment.
* In cases where the script is expected to be executed outside virtual
  environments, developers will need to be aware of the following
  discrepancies across platforms and installation methods:

  * Older Linux distributions will provide a ``python`` command that
    refers to Python 2, and will likely not provide a ``python2`` command.
  * Some newer Linux distributions will provide a ``python`` command that
    refers to Python 3.
  * Some Linux distributions will not provide a ``python`` command at
    all by default, but will provide a ``python3`` command by default.

* When potentially targeting these environments, developers may either
  use a Python package installation tool that rewrites shebang lines for
  the installed environment, provide instructions on updating shebang lines
  interactively, or else use more specific shebang lines that are
  tailored to the target environment.
* Scripts targeting both “*old systems*” and systems without the default
  ``python`` command need to make a compromise and document this situation.
  Avoiding shebangs (via the console_scripts Entry Points ([9]_) or similar
  means) is the recommended workaround for this problem.
* Applications designed exclusively for a specific environment (such as
  a container or virtual environment) may continue to use the ``python``
  command name.

For end users of Python
-----------------------

* While far from being universally available, ``python`` remains the
  preferred spelling for explicitly invoking Python, as this is the
  spelling that virtual environments make consistently available
  across different platforms and Python installations.
* For software that is not distributed with (or developed for) your system,
  we recommend using a virtual environment, possibly with an environment
  manager like ``conda`` or ``pipenv``, to help avoid disrupting your system
  Python installation.


These recommendations are the outcome of the relevant python-dev discussions
in March and July 2011 ([1]_, [2]_), February 2012 ([4]_),
September 2014 ([6]_), discussion on GitHub in April 2018 ([7]_),
on python-dev in February 2019 ([8]_), and during the PEP update review
in May/June 2019 ([10]_).


History of this PEP
===================

In 2011, the majority of distributions
aliased the ``python`` command to Python 2, but some started switching it to
Python 3 ([5]_). As some of the former distributions did not provide a
``python2`` command by default, there was previously no way for Python 2 code
(or any code that invokes the Python 2 interpreter directly rather than via
``sys.executable``) to reliably run on all Unix-like systems without
modification, as the ``python`` command would invoke the wrong interpreter
version on some systems, and the ``python2`` command would fail completely
on others. This PEP originally provided a very simple mechanism
to restore cross-platform support, with minimal additional work required
on the part of distribution maintainers. Simplified, the recommendation was:

1. The ``python`` command was preferred for code compatible with both
   Python 2 and 3 (since it was available on all systems, even those that
   already aliased it to Python 3).
2. The ``python`` command should always invoke Python 2 (to prevent
   hard-to-diagnose errors when Python 2 code is run on Python 3).
3. The ``python2`` and ``python3`` commands should be available to specify
   the version explicitly.

However, these recommendations implicitly assumed that Python 2 would always be
available. As Python 2 is nearing its end of life in 2020 (PEP 373, PEP 404),
distributions are making Python 2 optional or removing it entirely.
This means either removing the ``python`` command or switching it to invoke
Python 3. Some distributors also decided that their users were better served by
ignoring the PEP's original recommendations, and provided system
administrators with the freedom to configure their systems based on
the needs of their particular environment.


.. _rationale:

Current Rationale
=================

As of 2019, activating a Python virtual environment (or its functional
equivalent) prior to script execution is one way to obtain a consistent
cross-platform and cross-distribution experience.

Accordingly, publishers can expect users of the software to provide a suitable
execution environment.


Future Changes to this Recommendation
=====================================

This recommendation will be periodically reviewed over the next few years,
and updated when the core development team judges it appropriate. As a
point of reference, regular maintenance releases for the Python 2.7 series
will continue until January 2020.


Migration Notes
===============

This section does not contain any official recommendations from the core
CPython developers. It's merely a collection of notes regarding various
aspects of migrating to Python 3 as the default version of Python for a
system. They will hopefully be helpful to any distributions considering
making such a change.

* The main barrier to a distribution switching the ``python`` command from
  ``python2`` to ``python3`` isn't breakage within the distribution, but
  instead breakage of private third party scripts developed by sysadmins
  and other users. Updating the ``python`` command to invoke ``python3``
  by default indicates that a distribution is willing to break such scripts
  with errors that are potentially quite confusing for users that aren't
  familiar with the backwards incompatible changes in Python 3. For
  example, while the change of ``print`` from a statement to a builtin
  function is relatively simple for automated converters to handle, the
  SyntaxError from attempting to use the Python 2 notation in Python 3
  may be confusing for users that are not aware of the change::

      $ python3 -c 'print "Hello, world!"'
        File "<string>", line 1
          print "Hello, world!"
                ^
      SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print("Hello, world!")?

  While this might be obvious for experienced Pythonistas, such scripts
  might even be run by people who are not familiar with Python at all.
  Avoiding breakage of such third party scripts was the key reason this
  PEP used to recommend that ``python`` continue to refer to ``python2``.
* The error message ``python: command not found`` tends to be surprisingly
  actionable, even for people unfamiliar with Python.
* The ``pythonX.X`` (e.g. ``python3.6``) commands exist on modern systems, on
  which they invoke specific minor versions of the Python interpreter. It
  can be useful for distribution-specific packages to take advantage of these
  utilities if they exist, since it will prevent code breakage if the default
  minor version of a given major version is changed. However, scripts
  intending to be cross-platform should not rely on the presence of these
  utilities, but rather should be tested on several recent minor versions of
  the target major version, compensating, if necessary, for the small
  differences that exist between minor versions. This prevents the need for
  sysadmins to install many very similar versions of the interpreter.
* When the ``pythonX.X`` binaries are provided by a distribution, the
  ``python2`` and ``python3`` commands should refer to one of those files
  rather than being provided as a separate binary file.
* It is strongly encouraged that distribution-specific packages use ``python3``
  (or ``python2``) rather than ``python``, even in code that is not intended to
  operate on other distributions. This will reduce problems if the
  distribution later decides to change the version of the Python interpreter
  that the ``python`` command invokes, or if a sysadmin installs a custom
  ``python`` command with a different major version than the distribution
  default.
* If the above point is adhered to and sysadmins are permitted to change the
  ``python`` command, then the ``python`` command should always be implemented
  as a link to the interpreter binary (or a link to a link) and not vice
  versa. That way, if a sysadmin does decide to replace the installed
  ``python`` file, they can do so without inadvertently deleting the
  previously installed binary.
* Even as the Python 2 interpreter becomes less common, it remains reasonable
  for scripts to continue to use the ``python3`` convention, rather than just
  ``python``.
* If these conventions are adhered to, it will become the case that the
  ``python`` command is only executed in an interactive manner as a user
  convenience, or else when using a virtual environment or similar mechanism.


Backwards Compatibility
=======================

A potential problem can arise if a script adhering to the
``python2``/``python3`` convention is executed on a system not supporting
these commands. This is mostly a non-issue, since the sysadmin can simply
create these symbolic links and avoid further problems. It is a significantly
more obvious breakage than the sometimes cryptic errors that can arise when
attempting to execute a script containing Python 2 specific syntax with a
Python 3 interpreter or vice versa.


Application to the CPython Reference Interpreter
================================================

While technically a new feature, the ``make install`` and ``make bininstall``
command in the 2.7 version of CPython were adjusted to create the
following chains of symbolic links in the relevant ``bin`` directory (the
final item listed in the chain is the actual installed binary, preceding
items are relative symbolic links)::

    python -> python2 -> python2.7
    python-config -> python2-config -> python2.7-config

Similar adjustments were made to the macOS binary installer.

This feature first appeared in the default installation process in
CPython 2.7.3.

The installation commands in the CPython 3.x series already create the
appropriate symlinks. For example, CPython 3.2 creates::

    python3 -> python3.2
    idle3 -> idle3.2
    pydoc3 -> pydoc3.2
    python3-config -> python3.2-config

And CPython 3.3 creates::

    python3 -> python3.3
    idle3 -> idle3.3
    pydoc3 -> pydoc3.3
    python3-config -> python3.3-config
    pysetup3 -> pysetup3.3

The implementation progress of these features in the default installers was
managed on the tracker as issue #12627 ([3]_).


Impact on PYTHON* Environment Variables
=======================================

The choice of target for the ``python`` command implicitly affects a
distribution's expected interpretation of the various Python related
environment variables. The use of ``*.pth`` files in the relevant
``site-packages`` folder, the "per-user site packages" feature (see
``python -m site``) or more flexible tools such as ``virtualenv`` are all more
tolerant of the presence of multiple versions of Python on a system than the
direct use of ``PYTHONPATH``.


Exclusion of MS Windows
=======================

This PEP deliberately excludes any proposals relating to Microsoft Windows, as
devising an equivalent solution for Windows was deemed too complex to handle
here. PEP 397 and the related discussion on the python-dev mailing list
address this issue.


References
==========

.. [1] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream (with bonus grammar class!)
   (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108491.html)

.. [2] Rebooting \PEP 394 (aka Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream)
   (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112322.html)

.. [3] Implement \PEP 394 in the CPython Makefile
   (http://bugs.python.org/issue12627)

.. [4] \PEP 394 request for pronouncement (python2 symlink in \*nix systems)
   (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116435.html)

.. [5] Arch Linux announcement that their "python" link now refers Python 3
   (https://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/)

.. [6] PEP 394 - Clarification of what "python" command should invoke
   (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-September/136374.html)

.. [7] PEP 394: Allow the `python` command to not be installed, and other
   minor edits
   (https://github.com/python/peps/pull/630)

.. [8] Another update for PEP 394 -- The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems
   (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-February/156272.html)

.. [9] The console_scripts Entry Point
   (https://python-packaging.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command-line-scripts.html#the-console-scripts-entry-point)

.. [10] May 2019 PEP update review
   (https://github.com/python/peps/pull/989)


Copyright
===========
This document has been placed in the public domain.