You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+7-7Lines changed: 7 additions & 7 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -12,38 +12,38 @@
12
12
13
13
This repository contains the formal mathematical definitions and proofs for the **AION Architecture**—a post-Von Neumann computing model based on **Recursive Metagraphs (RMG)**.
14
14
15
-
The central thesis of this work is that by strictly enforcing algebraic graph rewriting (DPOI) within a "Two-Plane" commutation discipline, we can transform execution history from a transient side-effect into a tangible, geometric object. We call this **Computational Holography**: the ability to encode the entire volume of a computation's interior evolution onto its boundary edge.[1]
15
+
The central thesis of this work is that by strictly enforcing algebraic graph rewriting (DPOI) within a "Two-Plane" commutation discipline, we can transform execution history from a transient side-effect into a tangible, geometric object. We call this **Computational Holography**: the ability to encode the entire volume of a computation's interior evolution onto its boundary edge.
16
16
17
17
### Core Primitives
18
18
19
19
#### 1. Recursive Metagraphs (RMG)
20
20
21
21
Standard graphs are flat. Hypergraphs allow multi-way relations but remain flat. An **RMG** is defined inductively: a graph where every node and edge can carry a payload, and that payload can itself be an entire RMG.
22
22
23
-
***Formal Definition:** RMG is the carrier of the initial algebra for the functor $F(X) = P + \prod_{S \in \mathcal{G}} (V_S \to X) \times (E_S \to X)$.[1]
23
+
***Formal Definition:** RMG is the carrier of the initial algebra for the functor $F(X) = P + \prod_{S \in \mathcal{G}} (V_S \to X) \times (E_S \to X)$.
24
24
***Capability:** This allows for infinite nesting of state, enabling the system to model hierarchical dependencies (like ASTs, containerized processes, or neural networks) natively in the graph topology.
25
25
26
26
#### 2. Double-Pushout with Interfaces (DPOI)
27
27
28
28
State evolution is not defined by pointer arithmetic, but by **Algebraic Graph Rewriting**.
29
29
30
30
* We use **DPOI** in the adhesive category of Typed Open Graphs ($\text{OGraph}_T$).
31
-
* Rules are spans $L \leftarrow K \rightarrow R$ representing the pattern to delete ($L \setminus K$) and the pattern to create ($R \setminus K$).[1]
31
+
* Rules are spans $L \leftarrow K \rightarrow R$ representing the pattern to delete ($L \setminus K$) and the pattern to create ($R \setminus K$).
32
32
33
33
#### 3. The "Two-Plane" Architecture
34
34
35
35
To manage concurrency in a recursive structure, we separate state into two orthogonal planes:
36
36
37
37
***Skeleton Plane:** The structural topology (the "container").
38
38
***Attachment Plane:** The internal data residing in the fibers of the nodes/edges.
39
-
***Theorem 4.6 (Two-Plane Commutation):** We prove that operations on the attachments commute with operations on the skeleton (up to transport). This mathematically validates the "Attachments-First" parallel execution strategy.[1]
39
+
***Theorem 4.6 (Two-Plane Commutation):** We prove that operations on the attachments commute with operations on the skeleton (up to transport). This mathematically validates the "Attachments-First" parallel execution strategy.
40
40
41
41
### Computational Holography
42
42
43
43
The most significant result of this work is the formalization of the **Wormhole**.
44
44
45
45
> **Theorem 5.4 (Holographic Encoding):**
46
-
> The boundary data $(S_0, P)$, consisting of an initial state $S_0$ and a provenance payload $P$, is information-complete with respect to the interior evolution $S_0 \Rightarrow^* S_n$.[1]
46
+
> The boundary data $(S_0, P)$, consisting of an initial state $S_0$ and a provenance payload $P$, is information-complete with respect to the interior evolution $S_0 \Rightarrow^* S_n$.
47
47
48
48
This implies:
49
49
@@ -54,14 +54,14 @@ This implies:
54
54
### Rulial Distance
55
55
56
56
How do distinct observers agree on reality in a relativistic computational universe?
57
-
We define **Rulial Distance** $D_{\tau,m}(O_1, O_2)$ using **Minimum Description Length (MDL)** theory. It measures the algorithmic complexity of the "translator" required to convert one observer's view of a wormhole into another's. This provides a computable geometry for interoperability.[1]
57
+
We define **Rulial Distance** $D_{\tau,m}(O_1, O_2)$ using **Minimum Description Length (MDL)** theory. It measures the algorithmic complexity of the "translator" required to convert one observer's view of a wormhole into another's. This provides a computable geometry for interoperability.
58
58
59
59
### Ethical Implications
60
60
61
61
This architecture enables the perfect deterministic replay of cognitive processes. This capability necessitates strict ethical bounds derived from the [**Universal Charter**:](https://github.com/universalcharter)
62
62
63
63
***Principle 6 (Sovereignty of Information):** Provenance is interior life. Forced replay is interrogation.
64
-
***Rights for Forks:** A forked instance of a cognitive process is a sovereign entity, not a test fixture. "Forks are not test environments; they are lives".[1]
64
+
***Rights for Forks:** A forked instance of a cognitive process is a sovereign entity, not a test fixture. "Forks are not test environments; they are lives".
0 commit comments