You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking again at the response meta (see #55), it includes a receivedRequestSummary field that uses its own definition of filters that's not used anywhere else:
Filters:
description: >-
Ontology based filters. A CURIE syntax is encouraged to be used.
type: array
items:
type: string
example:
- BTO:0000199
- PATO:0000383
This requires filters to be strings, when two of the three kinds of filtering terms are objects, not strings. I can flatten to string in the response of course, but this is not that useful and will be ugly (e.g. I may have to escape double quotes in the object).
Shouldn't this definition point somewhere else, for example framework/src/requests/filteringTerms.yaml ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking again at the response meta (see #55), it includes a
receivedRequestSummary
field that uses its own definition of filters that's not used anywhere else:framework/src/common/beaconCommonComponents.yaml#/definitions/Filters:
This requires filters to be strings, when two of the three kinds of filtering terms are objects, not strings. I can flatten to string in the response of course, but this is not that useful and will be ugly (e.g. I may have to escape double quotes in the object).
Shouldn't this definition point somewhere else, for example framework/src/requests/filteringTerms.yaml ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: