Replacing a single patch in a series to reduce review overhead

[hpax]

It is reasonably common that a small error in a single patch in a long series can be fixed with minimal effort. In that case, resubmitting the series is a huge, unnecessary overhead on reviewers.

For myself, I generally tend to submit such patches with a header like:

[PATCH v5.1 10/12] ...

... as a reply to (In-Reply-To: set to), in this case, [PATCH v5 10/12].

Patchwork does not recognize this pattern, and automatic test framework that depend on it will not operate.

Assuming that recognizing this pattern automagically is not practical, the standard email header "Supersedes:" (alias "Obsoletes:") could be supported to indicate that a patch is intended to replace a previous version in a series.

As one concrete example, see this email thread:

https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20250514221405.471472-13-hpa@zytor.com/

In this case the patch being replaced is 12/12.