From beaeba70d5914665ce67620098e5283742702b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20G=C3=BCnther?= Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:19:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] DOC: fix bug in field data ERT --- doc/examples/3_ert/plot_02_ert_field_data.py | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/examples/3_ert/plot_02_ert_field_data.py b/doc/examples/3_ert/plot_02_ert_field_data.py index f5b8a924f..d66696651 100644 --- a/doc/examples/3_ert/plot_02_ert_field_data.py +++ b/doc/examples/3_ert/plot_02_ert_field_data.py @@ -41,9 +41,6 @@ _ = ert.showData(data, vals=k0/ data['k'], label='Topography effect', cMin=2/3, cMax=3/2, logScale=True, cMap="bwr") - -sdfsfsf - ############################################################################### # We can now compute the apparent resistivity and display it, once with the # wrong analytical formula and once with the numerical values in data['k']