-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-conforming function call does not show reason #20
Comments
I can reproduce this. I'm just tweaking a few things to make Ghostwheel play nice with the newest versions of Shadow CLJS and Figwheel and will look into this in the process. |
P.S. In the meantime you can see the raw error including all relevant details in the JS console. |
Great thanks! I am indeed having some more issues with ghostwheel and shadowCLJS. Will wait for that update before I try again. |
👋 Hi. I'm posting this same comment to all issue threads to just give a quick heads up that the project, despite rumours and some evidence to the contrary, is not dead. It was hibernating for a little while and now nearing the long-awaited next release, which will fix some long-standing issues (and introduce some breaking changes to the config). I'll be reviewing all open issues and PRs over the next couple of weeks, so stay tuned and thanks for the patience. See also this Slack thread |
Wow, ghostwheel is really great, thanks!
One thing that I don't get to work is this:
Calling
(add-positives -1 1)
rightfully detects a non-conforming argument, but does not show which argument did not conform and why:My namespace is declared like this:
Am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: