Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency #3830

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

D4ryl00
Copy link
Contributor

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 commented Feb 26, 2025

fixes #3567

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 marked this pull request as draft February 26, 2025 10:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🧾 package/realm Tag used for new Realms or Packages. label Feb 26, 2025
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 requested a review from a team February 26, 2025 10:25
@Gno2D2
Copy link
Collaborator

Gno2D2 commented Feb 26, 2025

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
  • The pull request description provides enough details
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: D4ryl00/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🟢 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission
The pull request description provides enough details

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: dependabot[bot])

Can be checked by

  • team core-contributors

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 changed the title Chore: refactor valopers Feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency Feb 26, 2025
@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 changed the title Feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency Feb 26, 2025

// MakeProposal creates a proposal to the GovDAO
// for adding the given valoper to the validator set.
func MakeProposal(strAddress string) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why strAddress string and not just std.Address?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 Feb 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be able to call this function from gnokey CLI directly, e.g.:
gnokey maketx call -pkgpath "gno.land/r/gnoland/valoper_dao_proposal" -func "MakeProposal" -gas-fee 1000000ugnot -gas-wanted 20000000 -broadcast -chainid "dev" -args "g1jg8mtutu9khhfwc4nxmuhcpftf0pajdhfvsqf5" -remote "tcp://127.0.0.1:26657" test1
and so don't need to create a gno file to create a std.Address object and run it with gnokey maketx run....

Do you think it isn't worth it?

@D4ryl00
Copy link
Contributor Author

D4ryl00 commented Feb 26, 2025

I have the same #3824 when this panic occurs.
The flow is:

  • add a new valoper with Active: false to force the panic
  • create a GovDAO proposal
  • vote to accept this proposal
  • execute the proposal to produce the panic

The outcome message doesn't show the panic message.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧾 package/realm Tag used for new Realms or Packages.
Projects
Status: Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve r/gnoland/valopers to onboard new validators
3 participants